Evaluating the Top-Bottom and Bottom-Up Community Development Approaches: Mixed Method Approach as Alternative for Rural Un-Educated Communities in Developing Countries

Abstract

This paper is evaluating the two popular community development approaches; the Top-down and the Bottom-up with their divergent differences in application and the influence each has in developmental projects/ programmes. The authors then proposes a new model / approach "MIXED METHOD". The works of John Cohan and Norman Uphoff, Robert Chambers as earlier advocates of participatory development comes to mind as they tried to deviate from the previous and most popular topdown approach. Considering the fact that there has been arguments on the choice of one against the other, this paper proposes the "mixed method" as the most appropriate approach, as a new approach to balance the dichotomy thereby filling the research gap in search of most appropriate community development method. This advocates the application of both methods as there is need for a mix of both top-down and bottom-up for effective community development. This view of mixed method is borrowed from the supportive and effective empirical evidence for the adoption of mixed methods research in recenttime. The review of previous articles, books, conference proceedings, and other internet publications were utilized as the methodological approach hence, the study used secondary data. The paper concludes that there should be a systematic blending or mixing of both top-bottom and bottom-up so as to achieve a holistic and appreciable sustainable development that carries every one along.

A stakeholder‐based approach to leadership development training: the case of medical education in Canada

“…Collins and Holton () remind us that an idiosyncratic needs analysis is critical for the effectiveness of leadership development programs. The bottom‐up approach to needs analysis has been successful in informing programming in such diverse areas as instructional leadership (Blase & Blase, ), Total Quality Management programs (Beer, ), community development programs in developing countries (Isidiho & Sabran, ) and forestry management (Khadka & Vacik, ). There is a paucity of empirical data that directly addresses exactly how to structure leadership development programs in medical and healthcare settings, and particularly in medical schools.…”

Community development through Islamic microfinance approach: The experience of Daarut Tauhid Peduli Bandung, Indonesia

“…These five 'Labontean' characteristics are the strategic objectives of community development used globally, to empower local communities, develop effective partnerships, work as multi-agencies, become learning organizations, improve the life and wellbeing of the community and, of course, create a sustainable community (Isidiho & Sabran, 2016). Therefore, community development is embodied in the organization's attempt to engage in social engineering in economically disadvantaged communities to reduce poverty and increasing wellbeing.…”

“…Accordingly, a fully bottom-up approach is not possible to be employed by KOPMU Daarut Tauhid Peduli due to the lack of management capacity. Theoretically, an effective community development program empowers communities to change their condition, and this can happen if the community is actively involved in every process of the program (planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation) (Isidiho & Sabran, 2016;Kenny & Connors, 2016). Nevertheless, in the current KOPMU program, the involvement of borrowers is still partial and limited in the planning of programs, such as their involvement in identifying, defining, and designing the type of businesses.…”

Gambaran Pelaksanaan Jaringan Sosial Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Dan Penanganan Kegawatdaruratan Kehamilan Dan Persalinan Di Desa Karang Bajo, Kabupaten Lombok Utara

“…Namun pada pelaksanaannya, akan ditemukan hambatan dan tantangan yang juga muncul dari dalam masyarakat karena pada dasarnya individu memiliki sifat yang ekspresif dalam berinteraksi dengan kelompoknya dan sangat memungkinkan untuk terjadi tindakan yang disosiatif. Sehingga untuk dapat mengatasi hambatan dalam pencapaian tujuan bersama, diperlukan strategi pembangunan dari bawah (bottom-up strategy) yang melibatkan peran aktif masyarakat untuk bersama-sama memberikan dan menetapkan gagasan/ide mengenai program yang akan dilaksanakan (Isidiho, 2016).…”