Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
When drilling in remote areas, in the absence of offset data, pore pressure is determined as a function of seismic rock velocity. The velocity model and corresponding pore pressure model form the basis for exploration well planning. These models directly impact the casing design, number of sections, and mud weight plan. For frontier exploration drilling, the relationship is not well established; this reliance is high risk and can benefit from a high-technology approach to reduce this risk. This study examines how velocity and pressure models updated using real-time measurements from a high-tech logging-while-drilling suite can enable key drilling decisions to be made, reducing risk and the time taken to drill the well. Seismic-while-drilling technology provides checkshot data while drilling, which is used to update the velocity model. The velocity model updates in the shallow sections allow modification to the forward trajectory to ensure targets are intercepted. Furthermore, real-time updates enable geostopping by refining the predicted depths of targets or marker horizons and ensuring no accidental penetration of bright seismic amplitudes that may be associated with potential pore pressure abnormalities. In addition, formation-pressure-while-drilling technology can be added to the seismic and sonic technologies to calibrate the predrill pore pressure model. The acquired formation pressures, coupled with the while-drilling petrophysical data, allow for the velocity to pore pressure transform and normal compaction trend lines to be calibrated and reduce the uncertainty of the pore pressure model ahead of the bit. The calibrated models permit the operator to confidently make decisions and continue drilling in a single section to intercept key targets, potentially eliminating casing strings, with the assurance that the kick tolerance and safe overbalance are maintained at an optimal level to reduce the risk of mud losses or kicks.
When drilling in remote areas, in the absence of offset data, pore pressure is determined as a function of seismic rock velocity. The velocity model and corresponding pore pressure model form the basis for exploration well planning. These models directly impact the casing design, number of sections, and mud weight plan. For frontier exploration drilling, the relationship is not well established; this reliance is high risk and can benefit from a high-technology approach to reduce this risk. This study examines how velocity and pressure models updated using real-time measurements from a high-tech logging-while-drilling suite can enable key drilling decisions to be made, reducing risk and the time taken to drill the well. Seismic-while-drilling technology provides checkshot data while drilling, which is used to update the velocity model. The velocity model updates in the shallow sections allow modification to the forward trajectory to ensure targets are intercepted. Furthermore, real-time updates enable geostopping by refining the predicted depths of targets or marker horizons and ensuring no accidental penetration of bright seismic amplitudes that may be associated with potential pore pressure abnormalities. In addition, formation-pressure-while-drilling technology can be added to the seismic and sonic technologies to calibrate the predrill pore pressure model. The acquired formation pressures, coupled with the while-drilling petrophysical data, allow for the velocity to pore pressure transform and normal compaction trend lines to be calibrated and reduce the uncertainty of the pore pressure model ahead of the bit. The calibrated models permit the operator to confidently make decisions and continue drilling in a single section to intercept key targets, potentially eliminating casing strings, with the assurance that the kick tolerance and safe overbalance are maintained at an optimal level to reduce the risk of mud losses or kicks.
There are several areas where modern technologies can be applied to improve hole conditions reducing the chances of tight hole and stuck pipe. Hole cleaning has always been a key issue in inclined and horizontal wells where cuttings bed form and can lead to time consuming, difficult hole conditions and sometimes stuck pipe when attempting to trip out the hole. Annular velocity is one of the critical parameters that can improve cuttings bed removal but power hungry BHA's and bit hydraulics can sometimes compromise the ability to provide sufficient flow rate to clean the hole. A circulating sub is often installed above the BHA that can be opened to bypass the BHA and provide maximum flow rate to clean the hole. It can also be used to dump high concentrations of LCM in a lost circulation situation that would otherwise block the BHA and bit nozzles. Almost all circulating subs are of a drop ball/dart type that has a limited number of cycles, usually 6 to 9. Balls have to be dropped to open and separate balls dropped to close. These subs have limitations when it comes to hole angle, as the balls require gravity to reach their seats. They are unreliable in inclinations above 65 deg, require surface intervention and are usually only two positions i.e. open or closed. In a packed off situation where the annulus is sealed around the BHA and circulation is prevented, the balls or dart sometimes do not reach their seat and the sub cannot be opened to try and relieve the pack off.This paper discusses the development of a multi-position electronic circulating valve that can be set to multiple positions by surface down linking. The circulating valve can be configured as a standalone tool or combined with a unique motorized disconnect clutch mechanism that is activated by sensing its environment, working through internal logic modes before being in a position to receive a surface signal to disconnect. This has application in a stuck pipe situation where the tool can be commanded to disconnect and the drillstring recovered avoiding the need for surface intervention and any form of wireline and explosives. This tool has application in any well but particularly high angle wells where the circulating valve can be down linked to the first position for partial BHA bypass increasing annular flow and the final, maximum bypass, position can be used for dumping LCM or fast wellbore clean up at section TD or at any point in the well. Deepwater operations with spread rates in excess of $1M per day can benefit from the time savings in wellbore clean up, response to lost circulation and flexibility and control in a stuck pipe situation without waiting for wireline crews or explosives to perform a disconnect.
Unplanned sidetracks are low-frequency high-cost events that have meaningful negative impact on the economics of oil field development. While it is clearly desirable to reduce the frequency and severity of unplanned sidetracks, without a robust baseline for event frequency it can be difficult to estimate the value and efficacy of actions taken to mitigate sidetrack risk. For high volume drilling operations, there exists enough data to establish a meaningful baseline. This study aims to quantify the costs of unplanned sidetrack operations to drilling in North America by estimating the frequency of sidetracks, the reason the sidetrack was needed, typical amount of lost footage and time due to the sidetrack being required. With estimates of these values available a better cost-model for sidetracks maybe developed with which sidetrack mitigating technologies and techniques may be better evaluated for return on investment. A comprehensive set of approximately 6,500 North American wells drilled in a two-year timespan (2019-2020) by a variety of operators, drilling contractors, and directional service providers was analyzed for frequency of sidetrack operations. In each case where a sidetrack was performed, a review was conducted to determine whether the sidetrack was planned, and whether a reason for sidetrack was recorded. Lost footage and time were estimated from survey records the original holes and the sidetrack wellbores. Cases where there was an intervening well drilled before attempting a sidetrack were excluded from lost time analysis. Also reviewed were case where multiple sidetracks were ultimately required for successful drilling of each wellbore, and whether an initial sidetrack increases or decreases the risk additional sidetracks being required. There were over 450 wells that required at least one sidetrack. Most of these sidetracks were unplanned and fell into one of four major categories: Equipment lost in hole, directional drilling error, unplanned geology, and hole quality problems. These four categories accounted for nearly 95% of all unplanned sidetracks. The average footage lost due when sidetracking was 2750ft. The average lost time was greater than two days. For wells that have already performed an unplanned sidetrack, it was found that with each additional sidetrack in a well the risk of requiring an additional sidetrack increases further. This suggests that there is even more value in preventing the first sidetrack than there may first appear. By establishing baseline rates of unplanned sidetracks for several common causes an expected cost to operations can be estimated prior to embarking on a development campaign. In the future, by demonstrating improved results over these baseline values, new technologies and drilling practices can better estimate the value provided to a drilling operation by mitigate rare adverse events.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.