2009
DOI: 10.2983/035.028.0210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Use of Exhalent Siphon Area in Estimating Feeding Activity of Blue Mussels,Mytilus edulis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow rate shown in the lower mantle cavity was similar to that reported by Jørgensen (Jørgensen, 1981) and Famme and Kofoed (Famme and Kofoed, 1983) in M. edulis. The flow velocity in the exhalant siphon has been reported to be in the range of 80-30 mm s −1 for Mytilus (Maire et al, 2007;MacDonald et al, 2009;Riisgård et al, 2011). Therefore, the flow velocities observed in the other cavities in the present study might be reliable as values for an intact non-stimulated Mytilus.…”
Section: Research Articlesupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flow rate shown in the lower mantle cavity was similar to that reported by Jørgensen (Jørgensen, 1981) and Famme and Kofoed (Famme and Kofoed, 1983) in M. edulis. The flow velocity in the exhalant siphon has been reported to be in the range of 80-30 mm s −1 for Mytilus (Maire et al, 2007;MacDonald et al, 2009;Riisgård et al, 2011). Therefore, the flow velocities observed in the other cavities in the present study might be reliable as values for an intact non-stimulated Mytilus.…”
Section: Research Articlesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Intensive studies have been conducted to measure the filtration rate, using either particle clearance or direct measurements of inhalant and exhalant flows (Bayne, 1976;Kiøboe et al, 1980;Riisgård, 2001). The exhalant jet velocity of mussels has been reported in a range of 80-30 mm s −1 for Mytilus (Maire et al, 2007;MacDonald et al, 2009;Riisgård et al, 2011). The introduction of video endoscopy (Ward et al, 1991) has made it possible to conduct in vivo observation of the gills inside the shell, and also to estimate the water flow from movement of microspheres in the seawater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under optimal conditions, suspensionfeeding bivalves filter the ambient water at a maximum rate, but under suboptimal environmental conditions, including low or very high concentrations of algal cells, the valve gape is reduced, and the mantle edges retracted [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. However, it has for a long time been a matter of discussion whether the filtration rate in suspension-feeding bivalves is physiologically regulated [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], or if it should be conceived as a basically autonomous process [2,5,[24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Physiological Regulation Of Feedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frank et al (2008) re ported average velocities of 4.32 ± 0.39 cm s −1 (mean ± SD) and a maximum velocity of 12.31 cm s −1 in one type of ex per i ments ('animal-generated flow velocities'), whereas the average maximum excurrent velocities were found to range from 1.7 to 3.8 cm s −1 in another type of experiments ('mussel feeding study'). The filtration rate (or clearance rate) as a function of the exhalant siphon area has been measured for a 60 mm shell length M. edulis by MacDonald et al (2009, their …”
Section: Exhalant Jet Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there is considerable variation be tween published values of the exhalant jet velocity of mussels (Jørgensen et al 1986, André et al 1993, Newell et al 2001, Stamhuis 2006, Maire et al 2007, Frank et al 2008, MacDonald et al 2009, Troost et al 2009), and little is known about the detailed fluid mechanics of flow near a mussel that is generated by the flow through the exhalant siphon appearing as a well structured jet (André et al 1993, Green et al 2003. This flow in conjunction with a possible imposed external flow from currents or other mussels will influence the grazing impact and thus the concentration distribution of food particles reaching the inhalant aperture; hence affecting the feeding conditions of the mussel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%