2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40688-015-0081-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Use of RTI to Identify SLD: A Survey of State Policy, Procedures, Data Collection, and Administrator Perceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(For the purposes of this article, we refer to all multitiered intervention frameworks using the term RTI.) Recent policy reviews indicate that 45 or more state education agencies (SEAs) recommend using RTI in schools and districts (Hauerwas, Brown, & Scott, 2013; Hudson & McKenzie, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(For the purposes of this article, we refer to all multitiered intervention frameworks using the term RTI.) Recent policy reviews indicate that 45 or more state education agencies (SEAs) recommend using RTI in schools and districts (Hauerwas, Brown, & Scott, 2013; Hudson & McKenzie, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, at the same time, recent findings from evaluations of RTI in practice have provided evidence to suggest that implementation of the framework in authentic school contexts is a serious problem; it is not happening as intended or with any measure of fidelity (Balu et al, 2015; Shinn & Brown, 2016). This problem becomes seemingly more serious as findings from aforementioned policy reviews (Hauerwas et al, 2013; Hudson & McKenzie, 2016) reveal that of the SEAs recommending the use of RTI, fewer than 10% provide guidelines for its implementation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although reliance on RTI data alone is considered insufficient for LD identification (Burns et al, 2008), some states allow LD identification based solely on RTI data (Hudson & McKenzie, 2016b). Furthermore, the services that the majority of students involved in RTI receive (i.e., screening, Tier 1 and Tier 2 interventions) are not special education.…”
Section: Rti and Special Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berkeley et al's "snapshot" at the onset of RTI made clear that most states acknowledged the potential benefits of adopting RTI, but there was notable variability in the development of policies and implementation guidelines. Furthermore, a more recent study by Hudson and McKenzie (2016b) found that fewer than 10% of SEAs that recommended use of RTI provide implementation guidelines for local education agencies (LEAs).…”
Section: The Advent Of Rtimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation