2021
DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2021.1943357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring in the clinical use of small molecule kinase inhibitors: a review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IM is an anti-cancer drug administered primarily to outpatients because blood samples are not always available at the end of the administration interval. Thus, IM C min is the most widely used pharmacokinetic proxy for predicting clinical outcomes [ 7 , 37 ], and C min is naturally used as a focus for TDM [ 38 ]. TDM for IM may reassure patients and physicians about full exposure to the drug and improve long-term adherence to this chronic treatment, which may be a promising approach for fine-tuning the IM dosage for better tolerability and optimal clinical outcomes in patients with GISTs [ 7 , 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…IM is an anti-cancer drug administered primarily to outpatients because blood samples are not always available at the end of the administration interval. Thus, IM C min is the most widely used pharmacokinetic proxy for predicting clinical outcomes [ 7 , 37 ], and C min is naturally used as a focus for TDM [ 38 ]. TDM for IM may reassure patients and physicians about full exposure to the drug and improve long-term adherence to this chronic treatment, which may be a promising approach for fine-tuning the IM dosage for better tolerability and optimal clinical outcomes in patients with GISTs [ 7 , 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, IM C min is the most widely used pharmacokinetic proxy for predicting clinical outcomes [ 7 , 37 ], and C min is naturally used as a focus for TDM [ 38 ]. TDM for IM may reassure patients and physicians about full exposure to the drug and improve long-term adherence to this chronic treatment, which may be a promising approach for fine-tuning the IM dosage for better tolerability and optimal clinical outcomes in patients with GISTs [ 7 , 37 ]. It is widely known that high IM C min increases the risk of adverse effects and toxicity, which can reduce medication adherence rates and quality of life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Development of PK/PD models can be successfully deployed to inform TDM; however, the infrequent dosing schedule of epirubicin and relatively short terminal half-life (18-45 h) limit practicality in this setting [9,10]. Additionally, while TDM is appropriate to guide on-treatment dose adjustments for antineoplastic drugs [11,12], it does not support optimal initial (cycle 1) dose selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We firmly advocate that both qualitative and quantitative aspects of cancer treatment must be considered as part of the precision oncology concept: it encompasses not only the selection of the best anti-cancer agents on the basis of tumor genetic biomarkers, but also the precise individualization of their dosage in each patient. Dosage individualization should be based on both the thorough adaptation to influential patient characteristics (a priori dosage adjustment) and the measurement of plasma circulating drug concentrations (a posteriori adjustment, i.e., therapeutic drug monitoring; TDM) [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. These quantitative issues are the focus of pharmacometrics, a discipline that has undergone a remarkable evolution over the last few decades, but of which oncology and cancer patients have yet to take full advantage of.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%