2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating theory-based evaluation: Information, norms, and adherence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, programs that focus primarily on providing new knowledge should not be expected to necessarily influence behavioral outcomes, even though they may measure them (Ham 2013;Jacobson, McDuff, and Monroe 2006;Stern and Powell, forthcoming). A similar theme holds for the tenuous relationship between attitudes and behaviors, especially in the environmental domain (Heimlich and Ardoin 2008;Jacobs et al 2012). As noted by others (Heimlich 2010;Monroe 2010), researchers could potentially play a stronger role in articulating theories relevant to program design, not only to ensure appropriate measures, but perhaps more importantly to enhance program design and reformulation (e.g.…”
Section: Insights On Ee Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, programs that focus primarily on providing new knowledge should not be expected to necessarily influence behavioral outcomes, even though they may measure them (Ham 2013;Jacobson, McDuff, and Monroe 2006;Stern and Powell, forthcoming). A similar theme holds for the tenuous relationship between attitudes and behaviors, especially in the environmental domain (Heimlich and Ardoin 2008;Jacobs et al 2012). As noted by others (Heimlich 2010;Monroe 2010), researchers could potentially play a stronger role in articulating theories relevant to program design, not only to ensure appropriate measures, but perhaps more importantly to enhance program design and reformulation (e.g.…”
Section: Insights On Ee Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary research in risk communication has found that the relationship between knowledge of preparedness strategies and preparedness actions is not necessarily very strong. Education programmes might contribute to a change in awareness and attitudes towards risk, but this does not necessarily mean that people’s behaviour actually changes (Jacobs, Sisco, Hill, Malter, & Figueredo, 2012; Johnson, Ronan, Johnston, & Peace, 2014). Furthermore, the effects evaluated are only short-term effects, and little is known about the long-term effects of disaster education (Ronan, Alisic, Towers, Johnson, & Johnston, 2015).…”
Section: Disaster Risk Communication: Interventions To Foster Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research examined verbal sexually coercive techniques under general labels such as "verbal coercion," "lying and manipulation," "talking someone into sex" (Fischer, 1996;Struckman-Johnson et al, 2003;Zurbriggen, 2000). This oversimplification of verbal sexual coercion might have caused inconsistency in prior findings and might also have led to ineffective intervention campaigns that fail to reduce inappropriate sexual behaviors (Jacobs, Sisco, Hill, Malter & Figueredo, 2012;Breitenbecher & Scarce, 2001). By understanding the different behaviors that comprise verbal sexual coercion and the different characteristics related to those behaviors, we can develop appropriate interventions for people who perpetrate different types of SBVs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By increasing awareness about the phenomenon, policymakers and those working in community settings may be able to reduce such actions, through the promotion of healthy sexual relationships and bystander support, among other measures. It is important to convey the message that SBVs apply to almost every student, as the literature indicates that prior educational campaigns may have failed due to many individuals' belief that information presented in the campaign is not applicable or relevant to themselves (Jacobs et al, 2012;Breitenbecher & Scarce, 2001). This study was based on self-report instruments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%