DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating traffic safety network screening: an initial framework utilizing the hierarchical Bayesian philosophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the method recognizes that a road segment or an intersection with zero crash during a given time period is expected to experience some crashes, close to the average number of crashes in similar sites, in the long term. However, as the Institute of Transportation Engineers explains, the EB method is not a fully Bayesian model, and it is "complex and not ready for widespread implementation" (Pawlovich, 2003). Moreover, the development of an SPF requires a large database storing the characteristics of reference sites (e.g., AADT per road segment, segment length, lane width, shoulder width, road grade, presence of a horizontal curve).…”
Section: Statistical Methods Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the method recognizes that a road segment or an intersection with zero crash during a given time period is expected to experience some crashes, close to the average number of crashes in similar sites, in the long term. However, as the Institute of Transportation Engineers explains, the EB method is not a fully Bayesian model, and it is "complex and not ready for widespread implementation" (Pawlovich, 2003). Moreover, the development of an SPF requires a large database storing the characteristics of reference sites (e.g., AADT per road segment, segment length, lane width, shoulder width, road grade, presence of a horizontal curve).…”
Section: Statistical Methods Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the Bayesian methods allow for a statement concerning the probability of P falling in the interval to be made for credible sets (105). An additional difference is that, while Bayesian methods do rely on prior distributions, sometimes causing them to be regarded as subjective, they do not rely on mathematical idealizations of a quantity, as is the case with classical methods (96).…”
Section: Traffic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, most Bayesian problems rely on some form of scientific judgment to specify the "likelihood" (all relevant experimental information about the unknown parameter) and prior distribution portions of the model. This aspect of Bayesian statistics offers an advantage over classical methods in that whenever another analysis is conducted, the Bayesian-based database and knowledge grow (96).…”
Section: Traffic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an extensive discussion of these methods, see (Zegeer (1986); Ogden (1996); H.R. Green (2001);Pawlovich (2003)). Though all of these methods have proven useful, all can be improved at least with respect to the identification of high crash locations and each has limitations, as discussed in the documents which we cite above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many network screening methods have proven useful (see e.g. Zegeer (1986), Ogden (1996), Pawlovich (2003)). Many methods that are recommended for the construction of lists of SWiP's rely on the estimation of long-run crash frequencies at each site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%