2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.afjem.2019.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating trauma scoring systems for patients presenting with gunshot injuries to a district-level urban public hospital in Cape Town, South Africa

Abstract: IntroductionTrauma scoring systems are widely used in emergency settings to guide clinical decisions and to predict mortality. It remains unclear which system is most suitable to use for patients with gunshot injuries at district-level hospitals. This study compares the Triage Early Warning Score (TEWS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) and Revised Trauma Score (RTS) as predictors of mortality among patients with gunshot injuries at a district-le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
23
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
23
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the perineum was found to be the least affected site (2%). These ndings are like those reported in previous literature [6,8,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Conversely, the perineum was found to be the least affected site (2%). These ndings are like those reported in previous literature [6,8,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our data showed limbs fracture with local soft tissue injuries as the most common presenting diagnosis, followed by visceral perforations, rib fractures and head injuries. These ndings are similar to studies conducted previously [8,13,14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our data showed limbs fracture with local soft tissue injuries as the most common presenting diagnosis, followed by visceral perforations, rib fractures and head injuries. These ndings are like studies conducted previously [8,13,14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%