2006
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.17.1.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Treatments for Ménière's Disease: Controversies Surrounding Placebo Control

Abstract: Although double-blind experimental designs are considered the gold standard for documenting treatment effectiveness, many treatments for Ménière's disease have not been evaluated using this methodology. Particularly with a disease characterized by exacerbation and remission, carefully controlled, long-term studies are required. The nature of the placebo effect is described in this article, and the concept of debonafide effect introduced. Ideally, patients should be given treatments supported by evidence-based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Separation of the effect of treatment from the cyclical natural history of the disorder poses difficulties for all studies of Meniere’s disease. Because the natural history is one of remission and recurrence, and because participants must have active vertigo to enrol in a study, spontaneous improvement through regression to the mean in terms of symptom frequency and severity is expected, creating the illusion of a therapeutic efficacy 6162 Thus, a control group is vital to contrast the long term treatment effect against spontaneous improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separation of the effect of treatment from the cyclical natural history of the disorder poses difficulties for all studies of Meniere’s disease. Because the natural history is one of remission and recurrence, and because participants must have active vertigo to enrol in a study, spontaneous improvement through regression to the mean in terms of symptom frequency and severity is expected, creating the illusion of a therapeutic efficacy 6162 Thus, a control group is vital to contrast the long term treatment effect against spontaneous improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, vertigo attacks recurred in all 77 patients. This result was likely due to 4 possible causes: (I) The change of clinical symptoms in these patients may have been a coincidence related to normal symptom fluctuation ( 21 , 27 ). (II) An acute increase in the endolymphatic space which was too small to be shown by MRI caused the vestibular disorder ( 28 , 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Due to natural course of the disease, vertigo attacks of 60-80% of patients improve without any intervention [56,57]. Patients who refused to take any medical or surgical assistance had spontaneous improvement of their symptoms at the rate of 71% [43].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%