2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3687-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating tumor response with FDG PET: updates on PERCIST, comparison with EORTC criteria and clues to future developments

Abstract: Eighteen years ago, the EORTC PET criteria standardized for the first-time response assessment by FDG PET. Response assessment by FDG PET has been further developed and refined by PERCIST (PET response criteria in solid tumors). This review describes the data underlying these two systems for assessing tumor response on FDG PET/CT. It also summarizes recent clinical studies that have compared EORTC criteria and PERCIST with each other as well as with the anatomically based “response criteria in solid tumors” (R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
0
27

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
5
72
0
27
Order By: Relevance
“…Tumors are known to upregulate GLUT transporters in a noninsulin-dependent manner (15), with subsequent similarities to that seen in brain tissues in which glucose is an obligate substrate (1,16). Given that TLG had a reservoir or sink effect in the brain FDG uptake, it is possible that a similar effect could occur in the primary tumor and/or its metastasis, given the similar mechanism of noninsulin-dependent GLUT that these methods provide better correlation to outcomes than do anatomic criteria such as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumors are known to upregulate GLUT transporters in a noninsulin-dependent manner (15), with subsequent similarities to that seen in brain tissues in which glucose is an obligate substrate (1,16). Given that TLG had a reservoir or sink effect in the brain FDG uptake, it is possible that a similar effect could occur in the primary tumor and/or its metastasis, given the similar mechanism of noninsulin-dependent GLUT that these methods provide better correlation to outcomes than do anatomic criteria such as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PET imaging with various tracers, including 18 F-FDG, is increasingly used for evaluation of biologic response to cancer treatment (1). Reliable and repeatable quantitative PET images are therefore important for follow-up examinations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die PET-Bildgebung ist in den diagnostischen Algorithmus vieler onkologischer Erkrankungen integriert und wird nach standardisierten Kriterien ausgewertet [33]. Darüber hinaus ist die PET/CT als Kombination aus anatomisch-morphologischer Information der CT und der In der Diagnostik von NET hat sich die in der Onkologie etablierte 18 F-2-Fluor-2-desoxy-D-Glukose( 18 F-FDG)-PET nicht als Standard durchgesetzt.…”
Section: Pet-bildgebungunclassified