2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2009.00620.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Uncertainty in Residual Stress Measured Using the Deep‐Hole Drilling Technique

Abstract: The deep hole drilling (DHD) method measures the through‐thickness distribution of residual stress in a component. Sources of uncertainty in the application of the method are identified and three different methods for determining the magnitudes of uncertainty are presented. The analyses are applied to experimental measurements of stress in two calibration studies for ferritic steel and an aluminium alloy. Finally, the residual stresses measured in a repair welded steel pipe are examined to assess the level of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to creating the reference hole, it is essential to install reference bushes [18,19]. Figure 3.5 illustrates this and shows the cross-section of a welded component with a front and rear reference bush glued to the component.…”
Section: Experimental Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Prior to creating the reference hole, it is essential to install reference bushes [18,19]. Figure 3.5 illustrates this and shows the cross-section of a welded component with a front and rear reference bush glued to the component.…”
Section: Experimental Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3.5 illustrates this and shows the cross-section of a welded component with a front and rear reference bush glued to the component. Both bushes act as reference diameters and also permit estimates of experimental uncertainty to be determined [19]. The reference bushes do not change in shape since no residual stress is relaxed in them.…”
Section: Experimental Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig.6 shows the results for a thickness ratio of 1.24D and 0.64D. The results have been compared with calculated results (Black) modelled using elastic plastic behaviour [5].…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first beam had dimensions of 24x10x200mm, the second beam had dimensions of 24x6.35x200mm. The beams were placed in a four point bending ring to introduce a known uniform bending residual stress in a zone large enough to attach two strain gauge rosettes [5]. On each beam a strain gauge of type CEA-062UL-120 and type CEA-125RE-120 (VISHAY tm ) was applied, giving for beam 1 a thick and intermediate thickness ratio, as summarised in Table 2.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%