2015
DOI: 10.1175/jtech-d-14-00157.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Unsupervised Methods to Size and Classify Suspended Particles Using Digital In-Line Holography

Abstract: Substantial information can be gained from digital in-line holography of marine particles, eliminating depth-of-field and focusing errors associated with standard lens-based imaging methods. However, for the technique to reach its full potential in oceanographic research, fully unsupervised (automated) methods are required for focusing, segmentation, sizing, and classification of particles. These computational challenges are the subject of this paper, in which the authors draw upon data collected using a varie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Floc selection criteria -The aspect ratio parameter enables the discrimination of some populations of SPM (Davies et al, 2015). This parameter was used to automatically classify the different constituents (as bubbles, diatoms and flocs) of the SPM and permitted to select flocs only: low aspect ratios (AR<0.1) were used as selection criterion to avoid the analysis of planktonic organisms as diatoms; high aspect ratios (AR>0.9) were used as criteria to remove bubbles (see Fig.…”
Section: =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Floc selection criteria -The aspect ratio parameter enables the discrimination of some populations of SPM (Davies et al, 2015). This parameter was used to automatically classify the different constituents (as bubbles, diatoms and flocs) of the SPM and permitted to select flocs only: low aspect ratios (AR<0.1) were used as selection criterion to avoid the analysis of planktonic organisms as diatoms; high aspect ratios (AR>0.9) were used as criteria to remove bubbles (see Fig.…”
Section: =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, we expect that highvolume species identification and quantification methods, such as automated environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling and metabarcoding techniques (Bucklin et al, 2016), will prove particularly useful, augmented by automated image identification with high-volume video/holographic plankton recorders (Davies et al, 2015).…”
Section: Benthic Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle size is one of the most defining parameters, but particle size distribution remains largely unmapped in most of the Nordic coastal ocean and lacking in current monitoring efforts. Today off-the-shelf optical sensors for in situ measurements of particle size distribution exist, including sensors using near forward scattering (Agrawal and Pottsmith, 2000), macroscopic imaging (e.g., Picheral et al, 2010), and holographic imaging (Davies et al, 2015). Some of these sensors could easily be included into existing monitoring programs.…”
Section: Summary and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%