2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating weather effects on interannual variation in net ecosystem productivity of a coastal temperate forest landscape: A model intercomparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are promising because precise and updated mapping of LAI and canopy height is a key input to validate dynamic forest models such as Physiological Principles Predicting Growth model (3PG) [47], the Carbon budget model of the Canadian Forest Sector (CbM-CFS3) [48], or the model of forest growth and carbon dynamics (TRIPLEX) [49]. In addition, these results open new avenues for the development of low-cost operational solutions in forest inventory development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These results are promising because precise and updated mapping of LAI and canopy height is a key input to validate dynamic forest models such as Physiological Principles Predicting Growth model (3PG) [47], the Carbon budget model of the Canadian Forest Sector (CbM-CFS3) [48], or the model of forest growth and carbon dynamics (TRIPLEX) [49]. In addition, these results open new avenues for the development of low-cost operational solutions in forest inventory development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Using these data, six daily fire weather indices were calculated based on the moisture availability of fuels and fire behaviour (Table 1). For this study, only three of the six available fire weather indices were selected, representing different aspects of fire behaviour [45,48]: ISI, to represent short-term changes in the availability of fine fuels; DC, to represent longer-term seasonal weather conditions and the availability of deep organic soil and large logs; and FWI as an overall index of potential fire energy output. For ISI and FWI, Podur and Wotton [45] calculated threshold values that distinguish fire spread events, where fire intensity is high, tree crowns are consumed, and the rate of spread is rapid, and non-spread events, where fire intensity is low, most burning occurs on the ground surface, and the rate of fire spread is low.…”
Section: Fire Weathermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blackwell and Associates for their help processing and collecting National Forest-inventory-style ground plot data. We also thank François Gougeon, CFS, for determining canopy tree density values for the sites and to Graham Stinson, CFS, for the CBM-CFS3 output files used in Wang et al (2011). We thank the UBC Land and Food Systems Biometeorology and Soil Physics Group, in particular Paul Jassal, Praveena Krishnan, Kai Morgenstern, and Elyn Humphreys for their work processing EC flux data, and Zoran Nesic, Dominic Lessard, Andrew Sauter, and Andrew Hum for their work running and maintaining the EC flux tower sites.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model tracks all major C pools to ensure closure and estimates annual NEP from NPP -Rh. Wang et al (2011) modeled forest processes using the CBM-CFS3 model for the 5 × 5 km area spanning the Oyster River and encompassing the DF49, HDF90, and HDF00 sites (Figure 1). Model runs for the area were performed on 1 hectare grid cells of forest disturbance history data, forest cover data, growth and yield equations, and disturbance transition matrices from Trofymow et al (2008) Comparing convergence of ΔC, EC tower ΣNEP, and CBM-CFS3 ΣNEP Comparisons were made among the estimates by first evaluating how each method ranked the stand ages.…”
Section: Cbm-cfs3 ∑Nepmentioning
confidence: 99%