2016 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/bigdatacongress.2016.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Analysis of In-Memory Key-Value Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance refers to the latency to serve memory requests. As existing benchmarks do not support data structures besides to String [25], we extend the memtier_benchmark tool to support them.…”
Section: Performance and Energy Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance refers to the latency to serve memory requests. As existing benchmarks do not support data structures besides to String [25], we extend the memtier_benchmark tool to support them.…”
Section: Performance and Energy Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cao et al assessed the key‐value store performance analysis too, but they used Memcached and Redis unlike Hazelcast. They focus only on the resource overhead unlike our proposal of service modeling and performance optimization schemes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cache memories are small indexes-smaller than the local index stored in each search nodecontaining processed queries with its top-k results. There are some caching tools like Memcached 1 and Redis, 2 , but these tools are not designed for metric spaces [12,31]. These are NoSQL databases that use key-value data structures in RAM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%