2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021jd034935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Assimilation of the COSMIC‐2 Radio Occultation Constellation Observed Atmospheric Refractivity in the WRF Data Assimilation System

Abstract: Numerical weather prediction (NWP) depends on accurate initial conditions. NWP model initial conditions are obtained by optimally combining the model forecast and the atmospheric observations from satellites and ground-based observations (Kalnay, 2003).Atmospheric refractivity, available from the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) radio occultation (RO) technique, is a relatively new sounding system that provides valuable information on the temperature and water vapor structure of the atmosphere (Anthes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, many forward observation operators potential of improvement. Singh et al (2019), Singh et al (2021 introduced an improved observation operator which takes also hydrometeors into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, many forward observation operators potential of improvement. Singh et al (2019), Singh et al (2021 introduced an improved observation operator which takes also hydrometeors into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The k1 ${k}_{1}$, k2 ${k}_{2}$, and k3 ${k}_{3}$ are refractivity constants following E. Smith and Weintraub (1953): k 1 = 77.6 K hPa −1 , k 2 = 77.6 K hPa −1 , and k 3 = 3.73 × 10 5 K hPa −1 (Culverwell et al., 2015). Further reading can be found for variations of the constants (Bevis et al., 1992; Rueger, 2002) and assessment of different refractivity constants (Cucurull, 2010; Healy, 2009; Singh et al., 2019, 2021) to compute refractivity. Background model temperature, specific humidity, pressure, and geopotential height are used in the above formula.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singh et al [35] evaluated the impact of assimilating FS7 RO refractivity profiles on the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model short-range forecasts over the Indian region. The WRF model employed the three-dimensional variational assimilation (3DVar) system, and the experiment period was during the summer monsoon season (June to September 2020).…”
Section: Anthes Et Al (2021)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After FS7 was launched, the data quality was verified by comparing it with other independent data, such as radiosondes, model forecasts, and reanalyses [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. As the first summary of the initial FS7 quality assessment, Schreiner et al (2020) [27] confirmed that FS7 RO data meet expectations of high accuracy and precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%