2007
DOI: 10.1021/es0622251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Comparison of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems and Federal Reference Methods for Emissions from a Back-Up Generator and a Diesel Truck Operated on a Chassis Dynamometer

Abstract: There is considerable interest in portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) for emission inventory and regulatory applications. For this study, four commercial PEMS were compared with a Federal Reference Method (FRM) for measuring emissions from a back-up generator (BUG) over steady-state loads and a diesel truck on transient and steady-state chassis dynamometer tests. The agreement between the PEMS and the FRM varied depending on the pollutant and the particular PEMS tested for both the BUG and chassis dy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(14 reference statements)
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow measurement is conducted with a factory calibrated pitot tube exhaust flow meter in the a tailpipe attachment unit. The SEMTECH-D PEMS and OBS-2200 PEMS have both passed validation testing with laboratory systems for inuse compliance testing and were demonstrated to be both accurate and precise, meeting the Section 40 Code of Federal Regulations standards, Part 1065 (BMSTC and Beijing EPB, 2010;Durbin et al, 2007;US EPA, 2005b). Besides, a Dekati Mass Monitor (DMM) (Liu et al, 2009) and two Electric Low Pressure Impactors (ELPI) (Liu et al, 2011) were used in the test to measure the on-road particle emissions.They are both manufactured by Dekati Co. Ltd. and based on ELPI T M technology, which is combined the particle charging and electrical detection.…”
Section: Test Vehicles and Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The flow measurement is conducted with a factory calibrated pitot tube exhaust flow meter in the a tailpipe attachment unit. The SEMTECH-D PEMS and OBS-2200 PEMS have both passed validation testing with laboratory systems for inuse compliance testing and were demonstrated to be both accurate and precise, meeting the Section 40 Code of Federal Regulations standards, Part 1065 (BMSTC and Beijing EPB, 2010;Durbin et al, 2007;US EPA, 2005b). Besides, a Dekati Mass Monitor (DMM) (Liu et al, 2009) and two Electric Low Pressure Impactors (ELPI) (Liu et al, 2011) were used in the test to measure the on-road particle emissions.They are both manufactured by Dekati Co. Ltd. and based on ELPI T M technology, which is combined the particle charging and electrical detection.…”
Section: Test Vehicles and Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Nonetheless, diesel fuel used by heavy vehicles is a type of environmentally friendly energy (Huang et al, 2010;Chen et al, 2007), but a large gap exists regarding fuel quality and vehicle performance relative to western countries (Durbin et al, 2007). These two characteristics have greatly decreased the environmental performance of diesel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuing development of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) has allowed the characterization of in-use emissions from off-road equipment. Over the past few years, there has been a considerable effort to standardize PEMS measurement to meet regulatory requirements for in-use compliance measurements for on-road vehicles and offroad equipment (e.g., Durbin et al, 2007Durbin et al, , 2009a. Much of this work was performed as part of the Measurement Allowance program, which included extensive laboratory testing at Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) and in-use testing using the University of California Riverside (UCR), College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT)'s Mobile Emission Laboratory (MEL) (Fiest et al, 2008;Johnson et al, 2008Johnson et al, , 2009Johnson et al, , 2010Johnson et al, , 2011aJohnson et al, , 2011bKhalek et al, 2010;Khan et al, 2012;Miller et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%