2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and comparison of the precipitation detection ability of multiple satellite products in a typical agriculture area of China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although rarely discussed, it must be pointed out that the accuracy of the original satellite precipitation data has a great influence on the downscaling results, regardless of the downscaling methods and the auxiliary variables. A large number of studies have shown that the GPM-era precipitation products have better accuracy as well as higher resolution than those in the TRMM-era (Tang et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2018;Peng et al, 2020). A comparative study has shown that the downscaled results based on IMERG V05B precipitation had better performance than those based on TMPA precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau in 2015 (Ma et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although rarely discussed, it must be pointed out that the accuracy of the original satellite precipitation data has a great influence on the downscaling results, regardless of the downscaling methods and the auxiliary variables. A large number of studies have shown that the GPM-era precipitation products have better accuracy as well as higher resolution than those in the TRMM-era (Tang et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2018;Peng et al, 2020). A comparative study has shown that the downscaled results based on IMERG V05B precipitation had better performance than those based on TMPA precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau in 2015 (Ma et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CCs and KGE's increase their optimal values from the northwest to the southeast across mainland China, and the RMSEs exhibit the opposite trend. Based on the results of other studies, the low IMERG precipitation accuracy in R7 and R8 may be affected by several factors, e.g., the topography, climate, spatiotemporal distribution of precipitation, and generation procedure of the satellite dataset (error correction and retrieval algorithm) [6,7,28,30,47]. Table 2 displays the distributions of the regional CCs, RMSEs, and KGE's at the 0.05, 0.50, and 0.95 quantiles of the daily, monthly, and annual IMERG data against the observed precipitation data for the eight regions and mainland China.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Imerg Precipitation At Multiple Temporal and Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the CCs and KGE's at the 0.95 quantile are slightly higher (even close to those of R1-R6), they are much lower at the 0.05 quantile (i.e., KGE' < 0). This result may be strongly related to the overlap of the CSCD and GPCC meteorological stations, including an overlap of certain meteorological stations in China [52], and to the sparse-distributed GPCC meteorological stations in western China for IMERG correction and the sophisticated mountainous terrain in this region [47,56]. According to the results of Figure 2, Figure 3, and Table 2, the IMERG possesses a strong capacity for monitoring intra-annual precipitation variations, and it features maximize performance at the monthly scale in comparison with that at the daily and annual scales.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Imerg Precipitation At Multiple Temporal and Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations