2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and enhancement of heavy metals bioremediation in aqueous solutions by Nocardiopsis sp. MORSY1948, and Nocardia sp. MORSY2014

Abstract: An analysis of wastewater samples collected from different industrial regions of Egypt demonstrated dangerously high levels of nickel (0.27–31.50 mg L−1), chromium (1.50–7.41 mg L−1) and zinc (1.91–9.74 mg L−1) in the effluents. Alarmingly, these heavy metals are among the most toxic knownones to humans and wildlife. Sixty-nine Actinomycete isolates derived from contaminated sites were evaluated under single, binary, and ternary systems for their biosorption capacity for Ni2+, Cr6+ and Zn2+ from aqueous soluti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(35 reference statements)
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other side, A. terreus AHM21696 at 50 ppm Ni 2+ was totally removed after treatment for 24 h and at 100 ppm Ni 2+ was reduced by 99.65 and 100 after 2 and 4 h of treatments, respectively but 100 % Ni 2+ removal was observed at Ni 2+ concentrations of 150 ppm and 200 ppm (Table 4). Greater premier concentration affords improved leading impose to overcome all mass transmit tolerance of metal ions between the aqueous and solid phase, resulting in greater probability of collision between metal ions and sorbents [1,2]. In agreement with our results Shantha and Poonkothai suggested that the effectiveness of Ni 2+ uptake by Rhizopus species was evaluated after 7 days of fungal species inoculation in graded concentrations (25%, 50%, 75% and 100%) of the Ni 2+ electroplating effluent [19].…”
Section: +supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other side, A. terreus AHM21696 at 50 ppm Ni 2+ was totally removed after treatment for 24 h and at 100 ppm Ni 2+ was reduced by 99.65 and 100 after 2 and 4 h of treatments, respectively but 100 % Ni 2+ removal was observed at Ni 2+ concentrations of 150 ppm and 200 ppm (Table 4). Greater premier concentration affords improved leading impose to overcome all mass transmit tolerance of metal ions between the aqueous and solid phase, resulting in greater probability of collision between metal ions and sorbents [1,2]. In agreement with our results Shantha and Poonkothai suggested that the effectiveness of Ni 2+ uptake by Rhizopus species was evaluated after 7 days of fungal species inoculation in graded concentrations (25%, 50%, 75% and 100%) of the Ni 2+ electroplating effluent [19].…”
Section: +supporting
confidence: 87%
“…These heavy metals at elevated concentrations in the environment specifically in different water resources is of main concern in respect of their extremely toxicity to biological systems, bioaccumulation in them, non-environmental decomposable and menace to human, animal and plant life [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some metals are toxic even at minimal concentrations and can cause chromosomal mutations (beryllium), reduction in growth rate (antimony), cell lysis (silver) or deactivation of enzymes (arsenic), for example. Other examples of metals that are considered to be toxic to humans, as well as to the environment, are nickel, chromium, copper, zinc, mercury, lead, and cadmium [1,2]. Natural processes which introduce heavy metals into the environment are volcanic eruptions, erosions, comets, weathering of minerals, ocean evaporation, and combustion.…”
Section: Heavy Metals In the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study conducted by El-Gendy et al [2], 69 actinomycetes isolated from polluted sites in Egypt were evaluated for metal-removing potential in single, binary and ternary metal systems. In a single metal system, all the isolates tested showed appreciable Cr(VI) removal, ranging from 9.1% to 59.4%.…”
Section: Chromium Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation