2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017ms001019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Enhancement of Permafrost Modeling With the NASA Catchment Land Surface Model

Abstract: Besides soil hydrology and snow processes, the NASA Catchment Land Surface Model (CLSM) simulates soil temperature in six layers from the surface down to 13 m depth. In this study, to examine CLSM's treatment of subsurface thermodynamics, a baseline simulation produced subsurface temperatures for 1980–2014 across Alaska at 9 km resolution. The results were evaluated using in situ observations from permafrost sites across Alaska. The baseline simulation was found to capture the broad features of interannual and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the climate data were procured from Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) Catchment Land Surface Model L4 V2.0 at daily, 0.25 • × 0.25 • resolution, which belong to the Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [35]. The CLM (Catchment Land Surface Model) data set has been used in a variety of application studies such as soil moisture [36], permafrost [37], and groundwater storage changes [38]. In addition, we collected extra data from 70 meteorological stations in Mongolia (Figure 1d) to evaluate the data quality of the GLDAS CLM.…”
Section: Climatic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the climate data were procured from Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) Catchment Land Surface Model L4 V2.0 at daily, 0.25 • × 0.25 • resolution, which belong to the Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [35]. The CLM (Catchment Land Surface Model) data set has been used in a variety of application studies such as soil moisture [36], permafrost [37], and groundwater storage changes [38]. In addition, we collected extra data from 70 meteorological stations in Mongolia (Figure 1d) to evaluate the data quality of the GLDAS CLM.…”
Section: Climatic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first filled missing gaps vertically by fitting a polynomial to the soil temperature profile (Kurylyk and Hayashi, 2016) on a daily 110 scale, then screened out outliers by examining the daily time series. Further, we aggregated both the ABoVE and the GIPL-UAF soil temperature measurements to ELMv1-ECA soil layer node depths using the inverse distance weighting method (Tao et al, 2017), and then averaged the two sets of aggregated observations. We used the assembled subsurface temperature observation datasets to evaluate the ELMv1-ECA simulated soil temperature profiles and the zero-curtain periods.…”
Section: Study Sites and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permafrost variations, including pronounced permafrost degradation due to a warming climate, have been reported for many regions, including Alaska (Nicholas and Hinkel, 1996;Osterkamp and Romanovsky, 1996;Jorgenson et al, 2001;Hinkel and Nelson, 2003;Jafarov et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2012;Jones et al, 2016;Batir et al, 2017), Canada (Chen et al, 2003;James et al, 2013), Norway (Gisnas et al, 2013), Sweden (Pannetier and Frampton, 2016), Russia (Romanovsky et al, 2007(Romanovsky et al, , 2010, Mongolia (Sharkhuu and Sharkhuu, 2012), and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (Zhou et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2016a;Lu et al, 2017;Ran et al, 2018). For the entire Northern Hemisphere, rapidly accelerated permafrost degradation in recent years has been reported by Luo et al (2016) based on in situ measurements at a point scale or a spatially aggregated scale (up to 1000 m × 1000 m) from the Circumpolar Active Layer Monitoring (CALM) network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these land models were run at coarse spatial resolutions, e.g. ranging from 0.5 • × 0.5 • to 1.8 • × 3.6 • for LSMs participating in the Permafrost Carbon Network (PCN) (Wang et al, 2016a) and from 0.188 • × 0.188 • to 4.10 • × 5 • for the models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) (Koven et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation