2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and improvements of RANS turbulence models for linear diffuser flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve flow predictions in RANS models, nonlinear eddy viscosity turbulence models were developed calibrated to the normal stresses (Heschl et al, 2013(Heschl et al, , 2014. The calibration ensured the log-law, and shear-layer behaviour was correct.…”
Section: Indoor Inhalation Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To improve flow predictions in RANS models, nonlinear eddy viscosity turbulence models were developed calibrated to the normal stresses (Heschl et al, 2013(Heschl et al, , 2014. The calibration ensured the log-law, and shear-layer behaviour was correct.…”
Section: Indoor Inhalation Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). The 2 -v f model (Zhang and Chen, 2009;Li and Gong, 2012;Heschl et al, 2013) has been popular, among the RSM and LES methods (Liu and Novoselac, 2014) as alternatives to indoor airflow modelling to serve as work arounds to resolve the strong anisotropic behaviour in the near-wall region. Recently the continuous random walk model has been applied to include the effect of turbulent fluctuations on particle trajectories which is based on the normalized Langevin equation (Dehbi, 2011;Ghahramani et al, 2014).…”
Section: Indoor Inhalation Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important decisions that have to be made in any numerical study of fluid flow is the choice of the turbulence model as it bears a substantial effect on the accuracy of the result. A large number of studies in the literature have reported assessment of different turbulence models for single phase flow, particularly in the areas of aerodynamics (e.g., Menter, 1994;Bardina et al, 1997;Walsh and Leong, 2004;Cheng-Hu et al, 2005;Zhai et al, 2007;Baxevanou and Fidaros, 2008;El-Behery and Hamed, 2011;Sagol et al, 2012;Heschl et al,2013). However, few studies have been conducted to investigate the effectivity of various turbulence models in simulating two-phase pipeline flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heschl et al used various linear and non-linear RANS turbulence models k-ε, k-ω and v²-ƒ in several test cases such as linear free jet, plane wall jet, 2D room geometry and 3D room geometry with partition to improve the prediction of linear diffuser airflow patterns inside the room (Heschl et al, 2013). Generally, the results indicated that all turbulence models show good agreement with the experimental data and the proposed non-linear turbulence model can improve the prediction of the airflow patterns inside the room.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%