2014
DOI: 10.12968/ijtr.2014.21.8.374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and model of rehabilitation for primary malignant bone sarcoma patients after limb salvage

Abstract: Background and aims It has long been suspected that the rehabilitation available to patients with primary malignant bone sarcoma (PMBS) is not always adequate and appropriate to their needs. The National Specialised Commissioning Group (NSCG) commissioned the 2012–2013 Quality Improvement Development and Innovation Scheme (QIDIS) project (rehabilitation programme) to review the current rehabilitation services available to the PMBS patient groups at all five bone sarcoma specialist centres in England. Methods T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 17 papers included in the review 3 were literature reviews [8,14,17], 1 was a mixed method study [22], 6 were retrospective cohort studies [23][24][25][26][27][28], 1 was a case control study [29], 4 were cross sectional studies [7,15,30,31], 2 qualitative studies [32,33]. Study populations were heterogenic and 3 studies included patients with a variety of cancers including sarcoma [22,26,28], 1 with both primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas [30], 7 with 100% soft tissue sarcoma patients [7,8,14,17,24,27,29] and 6 studies with 100% primary bone sarcoma patients [15,23,25,[31][32][33]. The age of study populations also varied with 5 studies reporting the results of adolescents and adults under the age of 35 years.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 17 papers included in the review 3 were literature reviews [8,14,17], 1 was a mixed method study [22], 6 were retrospective cohort studies [23][24][25][26][27][28], 1 was a case control study [29], 4 were cross sectional studies [7,15,30,31], 2 qualitative studies [32,33]. Study populations were heterogenic and 3 studies included patients with a variety of cancers including sarcoma [22,26,28], 1 with both primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas [30], 7 with 100% soft tissue sarcoma patients [7,8,14,17,24,27,29] and 6 studies with 100% primary bone sarcoma patients [15,23,25,[31][32][33]. The age of study populations also varied with 5 studies reporting the results of adolescents and adults under the age of 35 years.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standardised post-operative protocol focusing on mobility and transfers resulted in improved functional outcome scores in those with primary bone sarcoma [25]. However, the importance of individualised patient centred goals has also been acknowledged based on changes in functional outcome and was particularly beneficial for adolescents and young adults [15,22]. Furthermore patients who have a good understanding of their prognosis were found to be better able to set rehabilitation goals [28].…”
Section: A) Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations