Evaluation and Optimization of an Export Gas Compressor in a Natural Gas Project

Abstract

The possibility of removing the export gas compressor from the central process facilities (CPF) in a gas project and enlarging the size of the gas export pipeline from the CPF to reduce the total capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operating expenditure (OPEX) is evaluated. Adding the export gas compressor to the CPF will increase the carbon footprint of the CPF, the power requirements of the CPF, and the emission of greenhouse gases. The CPF equipment would be designed for a lower operating pressure which leads to larger equipment sizes. PIPESIM and HYSYS software were used to simulate the CPF and different sizes of the export gas pipeline. With an export gas pipeline size smaller than 24”, an export gas compressor is required for the CPF, and as the pipeline size is reduced, the compressor power requirement will rise. CAPEX and OPEX comparisons were conducted between adding the export gas compressor or enlarge the size of the export gas pipeline. CAPEX and OPEX decline with larger pipeline size.

Impact of Built‐in Helical Fins on the Performance of Oil‐Gas Cyclone Separators

“…Compressed air is one of the essential energy carriers employed in industrial and chemical processes [1][2][3]. Oil-injected screw compressors are extensively applied in the compressed air systems.…”