2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and optimization of border irrigation in different irrigation seasons based on temporal variation of infiltration and roughness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three days after irrigation at the flowering stage, the relative soil water content in the 0‐to‐20‐cm soil layer in W2 was significantly higher than that in W1, but there was no significant difference between W1 and W2 in the relative soil water content of the 0‐to‐40‐cm and the 0‐to‐200‐cm soil layers. The results showed that, under the condition of the same border specifications, field slope of the test plot, flow rate, and cutoff control index, more irrigation water remained in the shallow soil layers in W2, which is closely related to the water content of the surface soil before irrigation (Maheshwari & Jayawardane, 1992; Xu et al., 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three days after irrigation at the flowering stage, the relative soil water content in the 0‐to‐20‐cm soil layer in W2 was significantly higher than that in W1, but there was no significant difference between W1 and W2 in the relative soil water content of the 0‐to‐40‐cm and the 0‐to‐200‐cm soil layers. The results showed that, under the condition of the same border specifications, field slope of the test plot, flow rate, and cutoff control index, more irrigation water remained in the shallow soil layers in W2, which is closely related to the water content of the surface soil before irrigation (Maheshwari & Jayawardane, 1992; Xu et al., 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different letters above the vertical bars indicate that the differences between means are significant at the .5 probability level (LSD test) cm and the 0-to-200-cm soil layers. The results showed that, under the condition of the same border specifications, field slope of the test plot, flow rate, and cutoff control index, more irrigation water remained in the shallow soil layers in W2, which is closely related to the water content of the surface soil before irrigation (Maheshwari & Jayawardane, 1992;Xu et al, 2019).…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The sustainability level of agricultural water resources not only depends on the total amount of water resources and the quality of water resources of a certain city, but on the utilization efficiency of water resources. Therefore, other cities could learn from the experience of cities like Wuhan and Jingmen to combine the characteristics of agricultural land, field irrigation adaptability and technical requirements in the 17 cities, and actively adopt water-saving surface irrigation technologies such as plastic film mulching technology [95], small border irrigation technology [96], and furrow irrigation technology [97] to improve the effective irrigation rate on cultivated land. III.…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salahou et al (2018) conducted experiments on closedend border irrigation and proposed optimal distancebased cut-off times for different inflow rates to achieve high irrigation performance. Xu et al (2019) conducted experiments on border irrigation to analyse variations in soil infiltration parameters and Manning's roughness in different crop growth periods; they proposed an optimized combination of discharge per unit width and cut-off time for their study area. The use of inflow discharge and cut-off time as control variables for improving border irrigation performance is relatively simple and enables easy control of the cut-off time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%