Risk assessment is EFSA's core activity. The lack of quantitative data and standardized methodology to collect data for risk assessment may limit the use of formal and structured quantitative risk assessments and delay the production of accurate scientific opinions. The aim of this project was to develop a methodological framework to identify data needs in accordance with the risk questions and the relevant risk assessment methods. A review of AHAW panel opinions in the area of animal health, adopted between 2004 and 2010 (WP1) was conducted in order to identify and to categorize the most recurrent risk questions, the suitable risk assessment methods and data needs. Subsequently an inventory of the possible sources of required data and an assessment of their availability and accessibility were performed (WP2). Facts and metadata were distinguished from WP1 initial list of data needs and a metadata model for facts collection and documentation was then proposed (WP3). The outcomes and conclusions from the three first work packages was used to suggest a structured approach to collect data (facts and metadata) in regard to expected future risk questions. Based on four case studies related to Echinococcus multilocularis, E. granulosus, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome and Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis (WP4), we concluded that this approach could lead to more efficient preparatory data collection, and therefore enable more rapid response to new risk managers questions.
KEY WORDSRisk assessment, risk questions, animal health, data, fact, metadata 1 EFSA-Q-2010-00903 2 Acknowledgement: This study was carried out within the framework of the EFSA art.36 project (CFP/EFSA/AHAW/2010/01). We warmly thank the ANSES, CVI and ULg consortium team. We are grateful to all the experts from Belgium, France and Netherlands, who helped evaluate the needed data related to WP4 case studies