2012
DOI: 10.2514/1.j051694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Parameterization of Round Vortex Generator Jet Experiments for Flow Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A maximum loss reduction up to 28.4% relative to the baseline case is provided by the VGJ with a pitch angle of =20º and a yaw angle of β=0º. In external flow field, it has been concluded that the VGJ with the pitch angle ranging from 15º to 45º and the skew angle between 45º and 90º could obtain the optimal benefit on vortex generation and separation control, as shown by Zhang et al (2014) and Stillfried et al (2012). Therefore, the similar tendency is observed in this work, where an optimal yaw angle of β=0º corresponds to a skew angle of 48º against the inflow.…”
Section: Impact Of Vgj Orientationmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…A maximum loss reduction up to 28.4% relative to the baseline case is provided by the VGJ with a pitch angle of =20º and a yaw angle of β=0º. In external flow field, it has been concluded that the VGJ with the pitch angle ranging from 15º to 45º and the skew angle between 45º and 90º could obtain the optimal benefit on vortex generation and separation control, as shown by Zhang et al (2014) and Stillfried et al (2012). Therefore, the similar tendency is observed in this work, where an optimal yaw angle of β=0º corresponds to a skew angle of 48º against the inflow.…”
Section: Impact Of Vgj Orientationmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For a deeper analysis we follow the approach of parameterisation, which was originally published in a series of contributions (31-33) . They develop a statistical model for VGJs, based on the idea that the vortex is similar to a Lamb-Oseen vortex.…”
Section: Momentum Rearrangementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the VGJs are small structures in the boundary layer, which would require excessive grid resolution (25,29) . An approach to circumvent this problem was devised by the Stockholm research group, using the parameterisation (33) already discussed in Section 3.4, and formulating a model (31) that respects the integral features of the vortices (the Reynolds stresses and/or turbulent kinetic energy) in a spanwisely averaged sense. This model was calibrated by simulations with fully resolved VGJ structures (32) .…”
Section: Momentum Rearrangementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the mixing is effected large-scale momentum transport. Von Stillfried et al 12 reported that the actual boundary-layer conditions and many combinations are possible very important in the optimizing parameters of VGJs. According to this investigation, optimum ranges for the pitch angle and skew angle are between 15°–45° and 90°–135°, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%