2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.03.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and prediction of the shape of gas chromatographic peaks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key parameters of GC-MS (such as peak area and peak height) are highly affected by the ow rate changes of the carrier gas. Lower carrier gas ow is bene cial to compound separation, while higher gas ow is helpful to getting a better shape of chromatographic peaks (Moretti et al 2004).…”
Section: Optimization Of Gc×gc Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key parameters of GC-MS (such as peak area and peak height) are highly affected by the ow rate changes of the carrier gas. Lower carrier gas ow is bene cial to compound separation, while higher gas ow is helpful to getting a better shape of chromatographic peaks (Moretti et al 2004).…”
Section: Optimization Of Gc×gc Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key parameters of GC–MS (such as peak area and peak height) are highly affected by the flow rate changes of the carrier gas. Lower carrier gas flow is beneficial to compound separation, while higher gas flow is helpful in getting a better shape of chromatographic peaks . Meanwhile, it should be noted that the high vacuum system of MS does not allow for more carrier gas input, and a higher flow rate is detrimental to the vacuum system and detection performance .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower carrier gas flow is beneficial to compound separation, while higher gas flow is helpful in getting a better shape of chromatographic peaks. 18 Meanwhile, it should be noted that the high vacuum system of MS does not allow for more carrier gas input, and a higher flow rate is detrimental to the vacuum system and detection performance. 19 In this study, the separation performance for all target compounds at different carrier gas flow rates (0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.5, and 1.8 mL/min) was tested, and it was found that the rate of 1.0 mL/min could achieve the best separation and peak shape.…”
Section: Optimization Of Ion Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, there are a lot of publications devoted to the description and modeling the distortions of the shapes of chromatographic peaks influenced by different factors, including sample size and overloading the column (see, e.g. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]). However, such distortions have never been considered in relation to the dependence of retention indices of analytes vs. the ratio of their amounts to the quantities of reference compounds.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Dependence Ri( ) By Computer Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%