2017
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/197/1/012059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Selection of Best Priority Sequencing Rule in Job Shop Scheduling using Hybrid MCDM Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hafez et al (2018) evaluated the performance of dispatching rules when different number of jobs and machines are considered based on minimum total completion time. Kumar et al (2017) considered seven different sequencing rules in a problem related to job shop scheduling. The authors applied a hybrid MCDM technique like analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) to rank sequencing rules.…”
Section: Scheduling Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hafez et al (2018) evaluated the performance of dispatching rules when different number of jobs and machines are considered based on minimum total completion time. Kumar et al (2017) considered seven different sequencing rules in a problem related to job shop scheduling. The authors applied a hybrid MCDM technique like analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) to rank sequencing rules.…”
Section: Scheduling Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, data for scheduling and sequencing problem from a previous literature of Kumar et al (2017) is considered. The authors in their work demonstrated the method of calculating and choosing the finest sequencing rule by using hybrid MCDM technique i.e.…”
Section: Numerical Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two decision-making methods were used for this study: the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and data envelopment analysis (DEA). AHP is a multi-objective decision-making method that enables the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data [29,30] whilst DEA categorizes the criteria used as inputs and outputs, where the factors that need to be minimized are placed as inputs and the factors to be maximized are placed as outputs [31,32].…”
Section: Multi-criteria Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leu and Yang [43] adopted an integration of Genetic Algorithm and TOPSIS, in which Genetic Algorithm processes overall calculations to solve the problem and TOPSIS strives to balance multiple cost and time consumption objectives. Kiran Kumar [44] integrated AHP and TOPSIS methods, where AHP calculates weights of the criteria (objective functions) according to the assessments of decision makers and supplies the weights to TOPSIS method, and TOPSIS sorts priority dispatching rules according to their ranks. In their study, Jadhav and Bajaj [45] had a different approach, so that TOPSIS is determining the processing orders jobs.…”
Section: Solving Fssp With Mcdmmentioning
confidence: 99%