“…t the variables x 1 , n factorial design but it can be obser adopted, this is hese consideration temperature, in 0.2298 ≈ 0 (mathe 3 = 0 in x 2 and x 3 must ta n. Because the ca rved that some so possible by sim ns, the approxim environment), x 2 ematic model, Sch orresponds to th 2 K, justly this va tion proved the v ial design, despit is to agree with While a quantitative analysis of equation (14) was made, will soon be made a qualitative analysis of equation (13) by means of graphic representation of this equation and this discussion will be confronted with factorial design of the solidification process parameters (Table 1) and Figure 8. Figure 9 presents the response surface plots (Aslan, 2007;Paterakis et al, 2002), obtained from equation (13), that describe the influence of the factors on the overall desirability, Figure 9(a) shows the 3D response surface relationship between convection phenomenon (x 2 ) and latent heat release form (x 3 ) at zero level of mold temperature (x 1 ). Note that, for a given value of x 2 , as the x 3 increases and the Z decreases until a minimum value for the interval of x 3 between -0.8 and 0.2.…”