1990
DOI: 10.2307/328523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and the Summer Language Program Abroad: A Review Essay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second language (L2) learners who study abroad in an immersion context may or may not show linguistic development. Research has shown that immersion in the target culture is of great value to learners, especially in improving oral production ability (Brecht, Davidson, & Ginsberg, 1993;Collentine, 2004;Isabelli-García, 2003;Kaplan, 1989;Lennon, 1990;Liskin-Gasparro & Urdaneta, 1995;Milleret, 1990;Polanyi, 1995;. There are, however, inconsistencies in study abroad research because claims are made based on different acquisition aspects and distinct amounts of time spent abroad.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second language (L2) learners who study abroad in an immersion context may or may not show linguistic development. Research has shown that immersion in the target culture is of great value to learners, especially in improving oral production ability (Brecht, Davidson, & Ginsberg, 1993;Collentine, 2004;Isabelli-García, 2003;Kaplan, 1989;Lennon, 1990;Liskin-Gasparro & Urdaneta, 1995;Milleret, 1990;Polanyi, 1995;. There are, however, inconsistencies in study abroad research because claims are made based on different acquisition aspects and distinct amounts of time spent abroad.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Segalowitz and Freed (2004) used the OPI to examine oral fluency gains by comparing students who did to those who did not study abroad, and Juan-Garau and Perez-Vidal (2007) assessed fluency, accuracy, complexity, rate of formula use, and other outcomes of the oral performance of participants in role-play and narrative tasks with the OPI. However, the OPI is limited in determining oral fluency development because it is not sensitive to short-term changes, particularly at the upper levels (Freed, 1995;Liskin-Gasparro, 1995;Milleret, 1996), and it is not known how consistently it would perform in assessing teachers' language skills' development.…”
Section: Measures Of Foreign Language Development: Formal Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%