2016
DOI: 10.4172/2157-7579.1000354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation Commonly Used Anthelmintics Efficacy in Gastrointestinal Nematodes through Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test in Adaberga Dairy Farm, West Shewa Zone, Central Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…survived treatment suggesting the development of BZ resistance in these parasites, but at a low level. In Sudan, no previous data for anthelmintic efficacy in cattle are available, and few studies were published from other African countries, which mostly reported no development of anthelmintic resistance in cattle [ 49 , 50 ]. Albendazole efficacy was reported as 95.5% FECR in some cattle farms in Ethiopia [ 50 ], 74.9% and 98% in two different studies from cattle in Kenya [ 44 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…survived treatment suggesting the development of BZ resistance in these parasites, but at a low level. In Sudan, no previous data for anthelmintic efficacy in cattle are available, and few studies were published from other African countries, which mostly reported no development of anthelmintic resistance in cattle [ 49 , 50 ]. Albendazole efficacy was reported as 95.5% FECR in some cattle farms in Ethiopia [ 50 ], 74.9% and 98% in two different studies from cattle in Kenya [ 44 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Sudan, no previous data for anthelmintic efficacy in cattle are available, and few studies were published from other African countries, which mostly reported no development of anthelmintic resistance in cattle [ 49 , 50 ]. Albendazole efficacy was reported as 95.5% FECR in some cattle farms in Ethiopia [ 50 ], 74.9% and 98% in two different studies from cattle in Kenya [ 44 , 49 ]. All mentioned three studies, as well as most published reports from Africa, were based on the use of the McMaster method as a quantitative tool for nematode egg counts and the microscopic differentiation of nematode L3 pre- and post-anthelmintic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%