2005
DOI: 10.4267/2042/23946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Évaluation d'un outil méthodologique, le « double QCM », pour le recueil de conceptions et l'analyse de raisonnements en physique / Monitoring Student Progress in Physics Using Double Multiple-Choice Questions

Abstract: Dans le cadre d’un suivi du DEUG mis en place à l’université Paris 7, un nouvel outil méthodologique de recueil de conceptions et raisonnements en physique a été élaboré afin de permettre une étude à grande échelle. Il s’agit d’un double QCM dans lequel les étudiants doivent non seulement choisir une réponse parmi celles qui leurs sont proposées mais aussi choisir de la même façon la justification qui leur semble la plus pertinente. L'objet de cette recherche est d’évaluer cet outil et de déterminer dans quell… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As well, many works explain these conceptual difficulties by the fact that most teachers do not consider in their teachings the students' conceptions constructed before the lesson. The lack of such education is due, among other things, to the insufficient didactic formation (Coppens & Munier, 2005). According to these findings, it is relevant to have more information on the explanatory models of students (before and after teaching) about phenomena related to static electricity.…”
Section: The Context and Purpose Of The Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well, many works explain these conceptual difficulties by the fact that most teachers do not consider in their teachings the students' conceptions constructed before the lesson. The lack of such education is due, among other things, to the insufficient didactic formation (Coppens & Munier, 2005). According to these findings, it is relevant to have more information on the explanatory models of students (before and after teaching) about phenomena related to static electricity.…”
Section: The Context and Purpose Of The Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well, many works explain these conceptual difficulties by the fact that most teachers do not consider in their teachings the students' conceptions constructed before the lesson. The lack of such education is due, among other things, to the insufficient didactic formation (Coppens & Munier, 2005). According to these findings, it is relevant to have more information on the explanatory models of students (before and after teaching) about phenomena related to static electricity.…”
Section: The Context and Purpose Of The Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le domaine de raisonnement n'a pas été retenu afin de faciliter la cotation et la comparabilité des réponses. Par conséquent, la double question à choix multiple (Coppens & Munier, 2005) a été retenue. Cette double question à choix multiple est constituée d'une partie évaluant la culture scientifique et une autre évaluant le degré de certitude exprimé (Caleon, & Subramaniam, 2010).…”
Section: Instrumentation De L'étude Quantitativeunclassified