2ème Congrès Mondial De Linguistique Française 2010
DOI: 10.1051/cmlf/2010119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation des voyelles nasales en français L2 en production : de la nécessité d’un corpus multitâches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
25
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, French nasal sounds, for example, vowels (often novel for learners) have proved problematic showing variation across advanced learners and particular types of nasal vowels: <ON> /ɔ̄/was the most accurately produced but <IN> /ɛ/ was the least accurately produced and tended to be substituted by <AN/EN> /ɑ̄/ (Adeline Charlton, 2014;Neveu et al, 2010). Foreign language instruction seems to assist the development of novel French nasal vowels and shifts in phonological representations occur between proficiency levels (Martinez, 2016).…”
Section: A Different Process--new Sounds and New Mappingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, French nasal sounds, for example, vowels (often novel for learners) have proved problematic showing variation across advanced learners and particular types of nasal vowels: <ON> /ɔ̄/was the most accurately produced but <IN> /ɛ/ was the least accurately produced and tended to be substituted by <AN/EN> /ɑ̄/ (Adeline Charlton, 2014;Neveu et al, 2010). Foreign language instruction seems to assist the development of novel French nasal vowels and shifts in phonological representations occur between proficiency levels (Martinez, 2016).…”
Section: A Different Process--new Sounds and New Mappingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Divers types d'analyse sont ensuite appliqués aux données. Pour les mots en isolé, une évaluation experte vs non experte, éventuellement complétées par des analyses acoustiques (pour des exemples concernant les voyelles nasales et arrondies, voir Detey et al, 2010 ;Racine, 2012). Ce type d'évaluation n'étant pas adapté à la parole continue -la dimension morphogrammaticale est en effet susceptible de biaiser l'évaluation de la production de surface -nous avons choisi d'appliquer, dans la lignée de ce qui a été fait dans PFC pour la liaison et le schwa, une approche par le biais d'un codage alphanumérique de différents paramètres (Detey, 2012 ;Detey et al, 2014a ;Detey et al, 2014b ;Detey et al, à paraître).…”
Section: Le Projet « Interphonologie Du Français Contemporain »unclassified
“…In the light of studies conducted over the last 20 years, French orthography and, in particular, the nasal graphemes <n> and <m> play an important role in the acquisitional process of nasal vowels, as well as in the production process of nasal vowels in which phonological and orthographic representations are involved. Nevertheless, the graphemes <n> and <m> could play contradictory and potentially evolving roles in the acquisitional process: on the one hand, they inscribe in the orthography of the language the nasal feature inherent in the nasal vowel and could, as such, encourage the use of a nasal vowel; on the other hand, they materialise this nasality by means of the grapheme also used to write the nasal consonant /n/ and could, as such, explain the phenomenon of consonantisation of the vowel attested in several studies [4,5,[9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all the studies mentioned above, it refers to a language learned after the first language. In the studies by Montagu (2002) and Martinez-Marquez (2016), French is chronologically the second language learned, but in the case of Detey et al (2010) and Li et al (2019), it is probably the third language after English.Three studies point to a possible effect of orthography [8,9,12]. Only one study investigates the specific effect of a postvocalic nasal consonant [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%