2003
DOI: 10.1051/radiopro:2003015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Évaluation du facteur de mise en suspension de contamination dans les installations nucléaires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…√Stk 50 is often used to determine the cut size of each impactor stage which represents the particle size with a collection efficiency of 50 %. For most of the circular jet impactors, the number Stk50, which corresponds to a collection efficiency of 50 %, takes values in the range 0.22-0.25 [29,30]. Therefore, to collect particles with aerodynamic diameter even smaller it is necessary to increase U0 or decrease W, i.e.…”
Section: Cascade Impactor Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…√Stk 50 is often used to determine the cut size of each impactor stage which represents the particle size with a collection efficiency of 50 %. For most of the circular jet impactors, the number Stk50, which corresponds to a collection efficiency of 50 %, takes values in the range 0.22-0.25 [29,30]. Therefore, to collect particles with aerodynamic diameter even smaller it is necessary to increase U0 or decrease W, i.e.…”
Section: Cascade Impactor Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leur solubilité devient significative (quelques %) en phase de mise à l'arrêt (oxygénation La mise en suspension est due au balayage des particules contaminées non fixées par l'air ambiant. Les résultats regroupés dans le tableau 1, ont permis de mettre en évidence la valeur du facteur de mise en suspension des particules radioactives à 10-6 mpi (Boulaud et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified