2006
DOI: 10.2527/2006.8451265x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation in Appalachian pasture systems of the 1996 (update 2000) National Research Council model for weaning cattle1,2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard deviation of 23 grams in the estimation of ADG is smaller than that reported in NRC (1985) and CNCPS-S (NRC, 2007) models from 54 and 57 g respectively; a larger value reflects the variability of gain according to dietary and environmental differences (Whetsell et al, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The standard deviation of 23 grams in the estimation of ADG is smaller than that reported in NRC (1985) and CNCPS-S (NRC, 2007) models from 54 and 57 g respectively; a larger value reflects the variability of gain according to dietary and environmental differences (Whetsell et al, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The residual value was estimated, expressed as residual average daily gain (ADGres), calculated from the predicted daily gain (ADGpred) minus the observed daily gain (ADGobs) (Whetsell et al, 2006). The mean (M), standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of ADGpred, ADGobs, and ADGres were estimated with the UNIVARIATE procedure of SAS (2007).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found few instances where nutritive value indices dropped below acceptable nutritional thresholds for low-maintenance animals like dry cows. For example, herbage intake generally is limited when CP concentrations are less than 60–80 g kg -1 DM [23, 24], and mean CP concentrations did not reach these levels. Although many studies have examined the relationship between stocking methods and forage nutritive value, few have concluded that manipulation of rest period or grazing intensity alone can explain variation in the nutritive value of forage across time [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, late fall grazing effectively reduced herbage mass to approximately 1200 kg ha -1 most years. This level of forage biomass was almost low enough to limit intake by cattle [23] and should have provided ample space for clover species to emerge and grow in early spring. Coincidentally, the highest clover abundance we recorded occurred in May 2016 when precipitation greatly exceeded the long-term mean.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%