2000
DOI: 10.1177/13563890022209415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation in Complex Policy Systems

Abstract: The renewed emphasis in the UK on 'evidence-based policy making' has sharpened the focus on the utilization debate in the evaluation community. Traditionally, the emphasis is placed on methodological concerns but this article argues for a sharper focus on the underpinning theoretical bases of policy evaluation, both in terms of its role in policy making and in terms of the substantive theories which inform policy development and implementation. In particular, the article seeks to assess the implications of com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
184
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
184
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowing 'what works' is regarded as instrumental for designing interventions (Pawson and Tilley 1997;Sanderson 2000;Pawson 2006). In this case, it is significant for undertaking 21 future technology intermediation initiatives in a way that addresses structural interface deficiencies and promotes the enhancement and innovative activity of rural production systems.…”
Section: Conclusion and Avenues For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowing 'what works' is regarded as instrumental for designing interventions (Pawson and Tilley 1997;Sanderson 2000;Pawson 2006). In this case, it is significant for undertaking 21 future technology intermediation initiatives in a way that addresses structural interface deficiencies and promotes the enhancement and innovative activity of rural production systems.…”
Section: Conclusion and Avenues For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss these in detail (see Sanderson 2000) but some key points can be addressed briefly. First, I would argue that evaluation must move beyond its traditional concern with measuring effect sizes and degrees of goal achievement to embrace a theory-based approach to explanation.…”
Section: Some Implications For Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owens brings forth other possible "less comfortable" answers to the slow progress in suggesting that EPI necessitates a confrontation between societal goals where tough choices must be made. Still, however, the question of timing in analysis deserves to be raised (Sanderson 2000, Nilsson 2005, Kautto and Similä 2005. Although we know quite a bit about what the inertias have been for implementing EPI at the regional development arena in the early years we know less of how these conditions have evolved over time.…”
Section: Introduction and Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%