2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and concomitant meningococcal group C conjugate vaccine in healthy infants and toddlers in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming a standard deviation of 2.8 for log 2 peak PRNT or ELISA titer in each group (default for BN's PRNT 50 assay at time of protocol development), a non-inferiority margin of 2.0-fold [32][33][34], a type I error rate of 1.25%, and drop-out rate of 10%, 165 subjects in each of the three groups were to be enrolled in this study to achieve at least 148 evaluable subjects. To maintain at least 148 evaluable subjects per arm, an additional 29/151 (15.1%) subjects were enrolled to replace subjects who did not receive their second vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a standard deviation of 2.8 for log 2 peak PRNT or ELISA titer in each group (default for BN's PRNT 50 assay at time of protocol development), a non-inferiority margin of 2.0-fold [32][33][34], a type I error rate of 1.25%, and drop-out rate of 10%, 165 subjects in each of the three groups were to be enrolled in this study to achieve at least 148 evaluable subjects. To maintain at least 148 evaluable subjects per arm, an additional 29/151 (15.1%) subjects were enrolled to replace subjects who did not receive their second vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study arms from Japan were excluded because the PCVs were given subcutaneously Togashi et al, 2015;Togashi et al, 2013). Of the 33 study arms evaluating PCV immunogenicity in the different regions, the studies conducted in the WPR (Huang et al, 2012;Kim et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2013;Kim et al, 2007;Shao et al, 2004) showed higher GMCs compared to studies conducted in Europe (Diez-Domingo et al, 2013;Givon-Lavi et al, 2010;Kieninger et al, 2010;Martinon-Torres et al, 2012;Wysocki et al, 2009) and the Americas (Bryant et al, 2010;Gutierrez Brito et al, 2013;Lagos et al, 2014;Payton et al, 2013;Pichichero et al, 2007;Ruiz-Palacios et al, 2011;Scheifele et al, 2006;Tapiero et al, 2013;Yeh et al, 2010). The pooled GMC for serotype 4 after three doses of PCV7 (Figure 4) in the WPR was 5.19 mg/ml (95% CI 4.85-5.53 mg/ ml), while for studies conducted in Europe this was 2.01 mg/ml (95% CI 1.88-2.14 mg/ml).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Table 1 reports details of the study arms included in the systematic review: nine were studied in Africa (Dicko et al, 2011;Idoko et al, 2017;Jones et al, 2013;Madhi et al, 2017a;Madhi et al, 2017b;Moisi et al, 2018), 26 in the Americas (Black et al, 2000;Bryant et al, 2010;Gutierrez Brito et al, 2013;Lagos et al, 2014;Payton et al, 2013;Pichichero et al, 2007;Rennels et al, 1998;Ruiz-Palacios et al, 2011;Scheifele et al, 2006;Shinefield et al, 1999;Tapiero et al, 2013;Yeh et al, 2010), 56 in Europe (Bermal et al, 2009;Diez-Domingo et al, 2013;Esposito et al, 2005;Esposito et al, 2010;Gadzinowski et al, 2011;Givon-Lavi et al, 2010;Goldblatt et al, 2018;Grimprel et al, 2011;Iro et al, 2015;Kayhty et al, 2005;Kieninger et al, 2010;Knuf et al, 2006;Martinon-Torres et al, 2015;Martinon-Torres et al, 2012;Moss et al, 2010;Olivier et al, 2008;Reinert et al, 2008;Rodgers et 2013; Schmitt et al, 2003;Silfverdal et al, 2009;Snape e...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lower limit of the confidence interval for the difference between μ T and μ C should be greater than -d, which is the same as requiring the lower limit of the confidence interval for the ratio of the geometric means e μ T and e μ C greater than λ, where d = ln(1/λ). A commonly used margin [19][20][21][22] for the ratio is ln(1/2), which means that the experimental vaccine be at least half as efficacious as the control vaccine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%