We investigated the correlation between plasma ratio of dihydrouracil/uracil (UH2/Ura), a possible surrogate biomarker of hepatic dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment efficacy in rats with colorectal cancer (CRC). 5-FU pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were performed using DPD circadian variation in rats with 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced CRC. By plotting tumor volume after 5-FU treatment against pre-therapeutic plasma UH2/Ura, we inferred a linear relationship (r 2 =0.988). 5-FU concentration fluctuations induced by DPD activity variation affected tumor volume. In CRC patients receiving proper dosing regimens, plasma UH2/Ura could be an indirect biomarker for predicting 5-FU treatment efficacy, tumor growth, and 5-FU doses.Key words pharmacokinetics; biomarker; dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase; anti-cancer agent Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in Western and welldeveloped countries.1) Several environmental factors, including lifestyle, food, and body mass, play important roles in the induction and progression of CRC.2) Generally, surgery is the first-line treatment for patients with early-stage CRC (stage I or II), and it has been reported to afford a positive prognosis.3,4) However, surgery is less effective in patients with more advanced CRC (stage III); furthermore, patients with involvement of the lymph nodes are at a 50% risk of relapse following resection.3,4) Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy is often prescribed for patients with lymph node involvement in order to reduce the risk of recurrence.5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), an analogue of the natural pyrimidine uracil (Ura), is an anti-cancer agent that is widely used in the management of patients with cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, breast, head, and neck.5-7) At present, 5-FU remains the single, most effective chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of CRC. 8) Some studies have shown a relationship between systemic plasma levels of 5-FU and treatment efficacy. 9,10) Increased objective responses have been demonstrated when higher 5-FU area under the curve (AUC) values are maintained.9,10) However, the optimal method of using 5-FU remains debatable. Gamelin et al. conducted a randomized, phase III multicentre clinical trial involving 208 patients with metastatic CRC and reported wide pharmacokinetic (PK) variability and a large distribution of the optimal dose of 5-FU to achieve target 5-FU plasma levels.11) To achieve the prescribed target concentration levels, dose increase was required in 68% of the patients. The study investigators concluded that individual 5-FU dose adjustment on the basis of PK monitoring, not body surface area, is needed for an improved objective response rate, a higher survival rate, and fewer grade III/IV toxicities. In the field of oncology, researchers are focusing on the identification of predictive markers to improve the efficacy of 5-FU and decrease the likelihood of severe toxicity, which remain a challeng...