2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a complex intervention (Engager) for prisoners with common mental health problems, near to and after release: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: IntroductionThe ‘Engager’ programme is a ‘through-the-gate’ intervention designed to support prisoners with common mental health problems as they transition from prison back into the community. The trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Engager intervention.Methods and analysisThe study is a parallel two-group randomised controlled trial with 1:1 individual allocation to either: (a) the Engager intervention plus standard care (intervention group) or (b) standard care alone (control grou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although specifics of the ENGAGER intervention are used here to illustrate methodological points, we do not describe this complex intervention in detail. We refer interested readers to full descriptions of this intervention and its development (see Lennox et al, 2017;Pearson et al, 2015) prior to the full trial (Kirkpatrick, 2018). Offenders have high rates of mental health problems (Brooker et al, 2002;Grubin et al, 1997;Singleton et al, 1998), distrust, substance misuse, homelessness and relationship difficulties and high rates of comorbidity (Georgiadis et al, 2016), but poor continuity of service provision on release from prison (Byng et al, 2012;Williamson, 2006) and minimal access to mental health care (Forrester et al, 2013;Moore et al, 2015).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although specifics of the ENGAGER intervention are used here to illustrate methodological points, we do not describe this complex intervention in detail. We refer interested readers to full descriptions of this intervention and its development (see Lennox et al, 2017;Pearson et al, 2015) prior to the full trial (Kirkpatrick, 2018). Offenders have high rates of mental health problems (Brooker et al, 2002;Grubin et al, 1997;Singleton et al, 1998), distrust, substance misuse, homelessness and relationship difficulties and high rates of comorbidity (Georgiadis et al, 2016), but poor continuity of service provision on release from prison (Byng et al, 2012;Williamson, 2006) and minimal access to mental health care (Forrester et al, 2013;Moore et al, 2015).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clear starting point logic model of intervention components and aims underpins the intervention, based on the health trainer role in a previous trial of smoking cessation in disadvantaged groups 35 and the development of a collaborative care model for prison leavers with multiple health problems. 36 The health trainer role has been adapted for specific populations, including offenders 17 and smokers, 35 with early signs that the support is acceptable and feasible. However, further intervention development and piloting was required to integrate a focus on promoting mental well-being and multiple health behaviours and to understand the interactions between mental well-being and health behaviour changes.…”
Section: Development Of the Strengthen Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The service had recently collaborated in extensive PPI activities for a trial of an intervention to support prison-leavers with common mental health problems to achieve their goals (ENGAGER 2). 36 The research team attended the regular Monday morning group session in order to provide service users with information about the STRENGTHEN pilot trial and invite them to an introductory session to help them decide if they would like to be involved in advising about the development of both the intervention and the trial. It was at this stage that service users advised the research team that, due to the potentially sensitive nature of the topic, there should be separate groups for men and women.…”
Section: The Strengthen Peer Researcher Input To Intervention Developmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United Kingdom, female prisoners are fewer in number, are housed in prisons further from their homes, and have very different resettlement needs. The ENGAGER research team plans to adapt the intervention for women in future, subject to trial results (Kirkpatrick et al, 2018). 3.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the ENGAGER project was to develop and evaluate a complex collaborative care intervention for men with common mental health problems, such as depression and anxiety, which would bridge their transition from prison to the community. 2 The intervention was specifically designed to break down service barriers, particularly between health and criminal justice sectors, and build constructive relationships between professionals and clients, thus providing a foundation for ongoing engagement with services (Kirkpatrick et al, 2018). The intervention development drew on a number of sources, including a realist review of the scientific and gray literatures (Pearson et al, 2015), a series of detailed case studies of current practice, the lived experience of a group of peer researchers, and a formative process evaluation embedded in a pilot trial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%