2014
DOI: 10.3109/10929088.2014.886083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a computational model to predict elbow range of motion

Abstract: Computer models capable of predicting elbow flexion and extension range of motion (ROM) limits would be useful for assisting surgeons in improving the outcomes of surgical treatment of patients with elbow contractures. A simple and robust computer-based model was developed that predicts elbow joint ROM using bone geometries calculated from computed tomography image data. The model assumes a hinge-like flexion-extension axis, and that elbow passive ROM limits can be based on terminal bony impingement. The model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we recognise that the radius will potentially restrict movements of the humeroulnar joint and so included it as a passive component of our models. The forearm was modelled as a single rigid body (Willing et al, 2014), with the radius position fixed relative to the ulna and inheriting its rotations around a single shared joint centre. F I G U R E 1 Describing motion using helical axes.…”
Section: Articulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we recognise that the radius will potentially restrict movements of the humeroulnar joint and so included it as a passive component of our models. The forearm was modelled as a single rigid body (Willing et al, 2014), with the radius position fixed relative to the ulna and inheriting its rotations around a single shared joint centre. F I G U R E 1 Describing motion using helical axes.…”
Section: Articulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For representing the kinematics of synovial joints in musculoskeletal modelling different models have been used. The simplest one considers only one degree of freedom (DoF) (flexion-extension), representing a perfect revolute joint located in the sagittal plan [16,18,19]. Other studies [20,21] implemented a 2 DoF model considering flexion-extension and pronation-supination movements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational models of the elbow have been employed to study the joint biomechanical behaviour and analyse musculoskeletal movement [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. However, these models have limited clinical applicability by assuming a fixed joint axis of rotation (e.g., hinge joint) rather than a true anatomical joint constrained by ligament forces and cartilage contacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%