2020
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10504810.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Coupled Modeling Approach for the Investigation of the Effects of SST Mesoscale Variability on the Atmosphere

Abstract: It is well established that the large-scale oceanic fronts associated with the Kuroshio Extension and the Gulf Stream anchor the entrance regions of the midlatitude atmospheric storm tracks of the Northern Hemisphere (e.g., Nakamura et al., 2004Nakamura et al., , 2008. It is also widely accepted that the SST anomalies associated with the ocean mesoscale eddies that form along the large scale oceanic fronts have a major effect on the atmospheric boundary layer (e.g., Chelton & Xi, 2010;Small et al., 2008;Xie, 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This spatial distribution of the eddy kinetic energy suggests that in the control experiment the upstream generation of eddy kinetic energy is reduced and its downstream propagation is modified by the differences in the large-scale atmospheric flow. (A detailed analysis of the related differences in the energy conversion processes can be found in an earlier, preprint version of the present paper (Szunyogh et al, 2021). )…”
Section: Mean Sst and The Mean Atmospheric Flowmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This spatial distribution of the eddy kinetic energy suggests that in the control experiment the upstream generation of eddy kinetic energy is reduced and its downstream propagation is modified by the differences in the large-scale atmospheric flow. (A detailed analysis of the related differences in the energy conversion processes can be found in an earlier, preprint version of the present paper (Szunyogh et al, 2021). )…”
Section: Mean Sst and The Mean Atmospheric Flowmentioning
confidence: 97%