2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-010-0538-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a geometry-based knee joint compared to a planar knee joint

Abstract: Today neuromuscular simulations are used in several fields, such as diagnostics and planing of surgery, to get a deeper understanding of the musculoskeletal system. During the last year new models and datasets have been presented which can provide us with more in-depth simulations and results. The same kind of development has occurred in the field of studying the human knee joint using complex three dimensional finite element models and simulations. In the field of musculoskeletal simulations, no such knee joi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Still the 1 DOF knee joint is widely used as the standard configuration for the simulation software. It is possible that the forces in the hip joint are slightly overestimated as a consequence of the simplified knee joint (Sandholm et al, 2011).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Still the 1 DOF knee joint is widely used as the standard configuration for the simulation software. It is possible that the forces in the hip joint are slightly overestimated as a consequence of the simplified knee joint (Sandholm et al, 2011).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The differences of the kinematic between men and women are probably the consequence of various parameters. Musculoskeletal modelling (Damsgaard et al, 2006;Delp et al, 2007;Sandholm et al, 2011) may facilitate the investigation of the origin of these differences. Indeed, musculoskeletal modelling is a mechanical description of (at least) bony segments, joints and muscles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most prior knee models employed the subject-specific geometry of bone and soft tissues from imaging data (e.g., CT and/or MRI) [46][48]. It can however be challenging to obtain accurate shape and location information for the ligament insertion sites and meniscal root attachments from MRI: specific MRI sequences and configurations may be required for different tissue structures [6], [37], [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%