1998
DOI: 10.1142/s0218396x9800020x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a High-Accuracy MacCormack-Type Scheme Using Benchmark Problems

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As the time step is increased, the LDDRK 4-6 method will show an improvement over the RK4 method, as noted in Refs. [9,10]. are the nonlinear Euler equations, written in conservative form, where…”
Section: Boundary Stencil Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the time step is increased, the LDDRK 4-6 method will show an improvement over the RK4 method, as noted in Refs. [9,10]. are the nonlinear Euler equations, written in conservative form, where…”
Section: Boundary Stencil Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a new class of high-accuracy explicit MacCormack-type schemes has been introduced for computational aeroacoustics [9,10]. We extend this methodology to compact schemes, resulting in a class of highly accurate compact MacCormack-type schemes which use one-sided implicit stencils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known [11,23] that in order to conduct satisfactory computational aeroacoustics, numerical methods must generate the least possible dispersion and dissipation errors. In general, higher order schemes would be more suitable for CAA than the lower-order schemes since, overall, the former are less dissipative [13]. This is the reason why higher-order spatial discretisation schemes have gained considerable interest in computational aeroacoustics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known [7,14] that in order to conduct satisfactory computational aeroacoustics, numerical methods must generate the least possible dispersion and dissipation errors. In general, higher order schemes would be more suitable for CAA than the lower-order schemes since, overall, the former are less dissipative [8]. This is the reason why higher-order spatial discretisation schemes have gained considerable interest in computational aeroacoustics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%