1985
DOI: 10.1093/labmed/16.4.228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Laser-Based Three-Part Leukocyte Differential Analyzer In Detection of Clinical Abnormalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All these findings suggest that caution should be exercised in interpreting three-part dif results in samples with cell morphology deviating from normal. Findings similar to those in this study have been reported earlier for the correlation of results of manual differential counts and three-part difs assayed with other cytometers based on aperture-impedance (20 -22), as well as those based on light-scattering methods (23). The correlation coefficients varied between 0.91 and 0.98 for lymphocytes (typical and variant lymphocytes), between 0.94 and 0.99 for granulocytes (segmented neutrophils and bands), and between 0.56 and 0.65 for mononuclear cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…All these findings suggest that caution should be exercised in interpreting three-part dif results in samples with cell morphology deviating from normal. Findings similar to those in this study have been reported earlier for the correlation of results of manual differential counts and three-part difs assayed with other cytometers based on aperture-impedance (20 -22), as well as those based on light-scattering methods (23). The correlation coefficients varied between 0.91 and 0.98 for lymphocytes (typical and variant lymphocytes), between 0.94 and 0.99 for granulocytes (segmented neutrophils and bands), and between 0.56 and 0.65 for mononuclear cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Under linear conditions, an r of 1 or −1 reflects total consistency between the results of both methods. An r of >0.95 can be rated as very good and an r of >0.8 as acceptable (Tisdall 1985;Bollinger et al 1987;Tvedten and Wilkins 1988;Winkler et al 1995). In addition to the determination of r, the intercept and the slope have to been considered (Tvedten and Korcal 1996).…”
Section: Linearity Of the Measurement Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, several measuring tively). The resulting Information yields an effective principles are routinely used in the haematological screening for pathological blood samples, providing lab: The electrical resistance inethod (5), optical meth-important diagnostic Information and reducing the ods (6,7) and cytochemical methods (8,9,10). These number of manual differentiations in the haematocell counting techniques are being continuously im-logical laboratory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%