1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(76)81044-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a live, attenuated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
3

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the mucosal route of vaccination is more resistant to the immunosuppressive effects of maternal antibodies than the parenteral route of administration [13,38]. Whilst it is possible to generate live, attenuated viruses by passage in cell culture, it has been difficult to produce a genetically stable HRSV with an appropriate balance between attenuation and immunogenicity [34,169]. Furthermore, we have increased the virulence of a BRSV isolate by sequential passage in gnotobiotic calves 8 .…”
Section: Prevention Control and Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the mucosal route of vaccination is more resistant to the immunosuppressive effects of maternal antibodies than the parenteral route of administration [13,38]. Whilst it is possible to generate live, attenuated viruses by passage in cell culture, it has been difficult to produce a genetically stable HRSV with an appropriate balance between attenuation and immunogenicity [34,169]. Furthermore, we have increased the virulence of a BRSV isolate by sequential passage in gnotobiotic calves 8 .…”
Section: Prevention Control and Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A formalin-inactivated virus vaccine tested approximately 20 years ago failed to prevent infection, and actually increased the severity of disease upon subsequent RSV infection (Kim et al, 1969). Temperature-sensitive mutants have also failed as vaccines because of either insufficient attenuation or loss of immunogenicity (Kim et al, 1971 ;Wright et al, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A formalin-inactivated virus vaccine tested approximately 20 years ago failed to prevent infection, and actually increased the severity of disease upon subsequent RSV infection (Kim et al, 1969). Temperature-sensitive mutants have also failed as vaccines because of either insufficient attenuation or loss of immunogenicity (Kim et al, 1971 ;Wright et al, 1982).Work using purified RSV proteins from RSV-infected cells (Walsh et al, 1987), or vaccination with vaccinia virus recombinants containing the F (fusion) or G (attachment) glycoprotein in mice (Stott et al, 1986;Wertz et al, 1987) or rats (Olmsted et al, 1986; resulted in the induction of neutralizing antibody and in a significant reduction in the replication of RSV in lung tissue. Our previous work (Wathen et al, 1989a) demonstrated that vaccination with a secreted form of the F glycoprotein (Ft), expressed in insect cells using a baculovirus vector also resulted in induction of neutralizing antibody, and in significant reduction in the titre of RSV recovered from cotton rats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts at preventing RS viral infections using conventional vaccines, either temperature-sensitive mutants (Wright et al, 1982) or formalin-inactivated preparations of concentrated virus (Fulginiti et al, 1969;Kapikian et al, 1969;Kim et al, 1969), were abandoned because protection was inadequate or because vaccinees developed more severe disease following their next natural infection. More recently, perhaps in response to the vaccine failures, research has focused on elucidating the roles of viral proteins in eliciting protective humoral and cell-mediated immunity to RS virus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%