Evaluation of a multisite telehealth group model for persistent pain management for rural/remote participants

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals living in rural/remote areas have recognised barriers to specialist services for persistent pain management. Although there is current evidence to support the use of telehealth to deliver individual pain management support, there is minimal evidence to support the use of pain management programs delivered within a group model, using telehealth. The aim of the present research was to perform a formative evaluation of a persistent pain management program implemented using a multisite telehealth group model, and to examine consumer perceptions. Methods: The Manage Your Pain multisite telehealth group program was developed as a modified hub-and-spoke model. The model allowed participants from multiple rural/remote 'spoke' sites in Queensland, Australia to access four 2-hour specialist persistent pain management sessions from a metropolitan interdisciplinary persistent pain management centre ('hub' site, 491-1009 km from spoke sites), and simultaneously enable realtime access/interactions between participants at each of the spoke sites. Twenty-one individuals living with persistent pain participated in one of five multisite telehealth groups over the 10month period. All participants completed standard pain scales before and after the pain management program, including Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire 20 (CPAQ20), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS 21), Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and the Participant Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). The Patient Impression of Change Scale (PICS), a telehealth perceptions survey, and a semi-structured telephone interview were completed postprogram.Results: Results revealed significant (p<0.05) improvements in the activity subscale and total score of the CPAQ, with 6 (30%) showing reliable improvement (90% confidence interval), indicating higher levels of activity engagement and pain acceptance after the program. Four (19%) participants made reliable improvement on the BPI interference. Post-program, the PICS revealed 65% of participants reported improvements in overall function, 61% indicated improved mood, 57% reported improved physical activity and 50% had some improvement in pain. Post-program, less than 10% of participants reported having technical (audio, visual) issues that had impacted on their sessions, and more than 90% found telehealth to be comfortable, convenient and would consider using it for their healthcare in the future. Post-program, most participants felt they had connected and were in a shared health experience with other group members through the multisite telehealth model. The interviews revealed three main themes: 'group experiences', which involved comments relating to the dynamics of the group and the shared experience; 'telehealth accessibility', which pertained to perceptions of the telehealth model for accessing specialist services; and 'limitations and concerns', where participants spoke of possible improvements to the program delivery model. Conclusions: Resul...

Describing the delivery of clinical pharmacy services via telehealth: A systematic review

“…The search found several studies that used telehealth to reach patients in a rural setting, but patient inclusion was dependent on their access to telephone and internet providers. While telehealth offers innovative ways to address health care needs within rural communities, most programs before COVID‐19 rarely measured access to the internet or the availability of technology infrastructure available to patient populations before implementing telehealth intervention programs 44,84‐87 . In fact, the lack of internet (broadband) infrastructure prevalent in some rural communities limits the delivery of telehealth interventions there 84‐86 .…”

“…While telehealth offers innovative ways to address health care needs within rural communities, most programs before COVID‐19 rarely measured access to the internet or the availability of technology infrastructure available to patient populations before implementing telehealth intervention programs 44,84‐87 . In fact, the lack of internet (broadband) infrastructure prevalent in some rural communities limits the delivery of telehealth interventions there 84‐86 . This finding stresses the importance of more research and innovation to establish effective telehealth intervention design strategies to include, engage, and benefit rural populations.…”

Guidance for gynecologists utilizing telemedicine during COVID‐19 pandemic based on expert consensus and rapid literature reviews

“… ●Telemedicine is well‐accepted among patients for treatment of CPP and has been shown to improve pain acceptance and overall function 39 ●Mobile health apps and online resources can be used as adjuncts to treatment of CPP 29,32–34,59 …”

Towards improving primary care: Considerations on a Sicilian population-based survey

“…Moreover, in our opinion, the use of telemedicine could maximize patient management in the local health service, in situations wherein GP and patient are not in the same place. [3435]…”