2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07151.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a new analyser for rapid measurement of blood propofol concentration during cardiac surgery

Abstract: SummaryWe report laboratory and clinical evaluations of a blood propofol concentration analyser. Laboratory experiments used volunteer blood spiked with known propofol concentrations over the clinically relevant concentrations from 0.5 to 16 lg.ml )1 to assess linearity and the influence of haematocrit and concurrent drug administration. Analyser concentrations demonstrated excellent linearity (R 2 = 0.999). Blood spiked with commonly used drugs showed no significant variation compared to unspiked controls. Pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Propofol measurement was performed using the Pelorus 1000 analyser (Cowley et al. , 2012; Liu et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Propofol measurement was performed using the Pelorus 1000 analyser (Cowley et al. , 2012; Liu et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propofol measurement was performed using the Pelorus 1000 analyser (Cowley et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2012). No sample preparation was needed, each measurement required injection of approximately 0.5 mL whole heparinized blood into the system.…”
Section: Propofol Analysis and Methods Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this optimized temperature, an individual measurement can be accomplished within 1 min. This measurement process is much faster than that from other analyzers1213.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Fig. 8, the agreement between these two methods is assessed using Bland-Altman method12. The result shows a small positive bias of 0.15 μg mL −1 (mean difference between the propofol concentration measured by the IMS and HPLC), with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.49 μg mL −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation