2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a new bond-type anchorage system with expansive grout for a single FRP rod

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the basic anchorage length of domestic and foreign codes, the basic anchorage length of the connecting reinforcement of prefabricated bridge is 0.49 times, 0.79 times, and 1.05 times of that of JTG3362-2018 [27], ACI318-11 [34] and AS3600 [33], respectively. In Table 8, the comparison of anchorage length between domestic and foreign codes and formula (7). Compared with the provisions of domestic and foreign codes for the basic anchorage length of reinforcement (Figure 19), it can be observed that the basic anchorage length of JTG3362-2018 [27] is 1.61 times and 2.14 times of that of ACI318-11 [34] and AS3600 [33], respectively, compared with Figure 18 and, in Figure 18, the relationship between the critical anchorage length and the basic anchorage length in Chinese and foreign codes can be obtained.…”
Section: Calculation Formula For the Anchorage Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with the basic anchorage length of domestic and foreign codes, the basic anchorage length of the connecting reinforcement of prefabricated bridge is 0.49 times, 0.79 times, and 1.05 times of that of JTG3362-2018 [27], ACI318-11 [34] and AS3600 [33], respectively. In Table 8, the comparison of anchorage length between domestic and foreign codes and formula (7). Compared with the provisions of domestic and foreign codes for the basic anchorage length of reinforcement (Figure 19), it can be observed that the basic anchorage length of JTG3362-2018 [27] is 1.61 times and 2.14 times of that of ACI318-11 [34] and AS3600 [33], respectively, compared with Figure 18 and, in Figure 18, the relationship between the critical anchorage length and the basic anchorage length in Chinese and foreign codes can be obtained.…”
Section: Calculation Formula For the Anchorage Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the basic anchorage length of domestic and foreign codes, the basic anchorage length of the connecting reinforcement of prefabricated bridge is 0.49 times, 0.79 times, and 1.05 times of that of JTG3362-2018 [27], ACI318-11 [34] and AS3600 [33], respectively. In Table 8, the comparison of anchorage length between domestic and foreign codes and formula (7). In short, if the current domestic codes of prefabricated concrete will still be followed for the design of the anchorage length of prefabricated members, the size of prefabricated components will be too large, which will increase the construction cost and construction difficulty.…”
Section: Calculation Formula For the Anchorage Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…∆L S C = 0.00240D S 2 + 0.0850D S − 0.1495 (7) where D U and D S are the displacements in the unloading and second loading cycles, respectively. Figure 16 presents the comparison of the regression curves and anchor colloidal deformations in the experiment.…”
Section: Anchor Colloidal Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its orthotropic characteristic, the traditional anchorage system for steel strands is not suitable [6]. Considering the efficiency of practical application, a bonded-type anchor has been specially developed for the BFRP tendon [7,8]. Then, based on the experimental and numerical analyses, Chen [9] proposed an analytical model to estimate the mechanical behavior of the FRP joint with the bonded anchor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%