2004
DOI: 10.1080/02841860410031381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a new method for calculation of cumulative doses in the rectum wall using repeat ct scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the ordering (ranking) of OR sub-volume elements according to dose is approximately the same in all fractions, DVH summation will resemble DIR-based dose accumulation. Similar observations may be expected in ORs such as rectum (in prostate, bladder and cervix cancer) (Kvinnsland et al 2004) and parotid glands (in head and neck cancer), since the location of the hot and cold regions are expected to be stable during RT. However, the discrepancy between DIR-based dose accumulation and DVH summation will be larger for very deformable organs which may completely change location in relation to the treatment field, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the ordering (ranking) of OR sub-volume elements according to dose is approximately the same in all fractions, DVH summation will resemble DIR-based dose accumulation. Similar observations may be expected in ORs such as rectum (in prostate, bladder and cervix cancer) (Kvinnsland et al 2004) and parotid glands (in head and neck cancer), since the location of the hot and cold regions are expected to be stable during RT. However, the discrepancy between DIR-based dose accumulation and DVH summation will be larger for very deformable organs which may completely change location in relation to the treatment field, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The bladder DVH parameters from the initial treatment plan and DVH parameters based on DVH summation were compared to the corresponding parameters derived using DIR-based dose accumulation. DVH summation was performed by crude addition across the plans recalculated on the repeat CT scans (the so-called histogram method investigated by Kvinnsland et al (2004)). For a given patient, each of the DVHs from the repeat CTs was weighted with a factor, F, given by the ratio between the total number of fractions (39) and the number of available CTs for treatment simulation (8 or 9).…”
Section: Dvh Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the availability of large-scale patient-specific accumulated/delivered dose distributions along with corresponding follow-up data is still limited. Several investigators have described organ shape variations on a population basis using the information from multiple CT images to simulate organ motion [1,1113]. Overall, these studies have shown that the doses from simulated motion can often better reflect the actual dose delivered to the organ than the dose distribution from the pCT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dose over the fractions, either to report the delivered dose or to compare with the planning dose (dose monitoring), to trigger, for example, re-planning. Indeed, in EBRT, the dosevolume histograms (DVHs) cannot be simply aggregated when considering deformable structures [85][86][87][88][89]. Local anatomical variations must be accounted for in mapping the fraction doses to a CCS before summation.…”
Section: Dir In Art For Dose Accumulation Justification and Principlementioning
confidence: 99%