2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a new press-fit in situ setting composite porous scaffold for cancellous bone repair: Towards a “surgeon-friendly” bone filler?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the flexibility and the trabecular‐like structure of the crosslinked PTMC was conserved in all the composite scaffolds. This advantageous property could allow to dynamically load the scaffolds for in vitro cell culture in bioreactor or to use such scaffolds as press‐fit porous filler for bone defects, as alternative to CaP‐based granules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the flexibility and the trabecular‐like structure of the crosslinked PTMC was conserved in all the composite scaffolds. This advantageous property could allow to dynamically load the scaffolds for in vitro cell culture in bioreactor or to use such scaffolds as press‐fit porous filler for bone defects, as alternative to CaP‐based granules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of polyurethanes and biocompatible, biodegradable short-chain polyesters represents a promising solution to the limitations of each individual material and encouraging early results have been reported. Previous work on polyester urethanes has shown compressive moduli ranging from cements at 49 MPa [22] to pressure-molded composites at 9000 MPa [23]. Likewise, compressive strength of these materials has ranged from 13 MPa [24] to 150 MPa [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newer fabrication techniques have been proposed which allow greater control of pore size, porosity, scaffold shape, ease of fabrication, and reliability of physicomechanical properties. Recent fabrication techniques include 3D printing [ 24 ], stereolithography [ 25 ], in situ synthesis using a reactive phase [ 26 ], and laser cladding [ 27 ]. These methods are particularly useful for creating customized scaffolds with predictable mechanical performance.…”
Section: Innovations In Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%