2021
DOI: 10.1080/1828051x.2021.1874843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a nitrite-free commercial preparation in the production of swine and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) salami

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a commercial formulation consisting of natural ingredients and dextrose on the production of salami. We analysed the effect on microbiological, physico-chemical and sensorial properties in the production of nitrite-free swine and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) salami. Six batches of salami were prepared: four with the addition of starter cultures and diverse substrates (no substrate, skimmed milk, commercial formulation and dextrose) and two without starter cu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each analysis, eight bacterial populations were evaluated: total aerobic mesophilic flora, Lactobacillus spp., Lactococcus spp., enterococci, Staphylococcus spp., Enterobacteriaceae , total coliforms and Pseudomonas spp. The methodology used for the microbiological analysis has already been described by the authors in a previous work [ 25 ]. At the end, the number of colonies was converted to the log of colony forming units per gram (log CFU/g), and the mean was calculated for each analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each analysis, eight bacterial populations were evaluated: total aerobic mesophilic flora, Lactobacillus spp., Lactococcus spp., enterococci, Staphylococcus spp., Enterobacteriaceae , total coliforms and Pseudomonas spp. The methodology used for the microbiological analysis has already been described by the authors in a previous work [ 25 ]. At the end, the number of colonies was converted to the log of colony forming units per gram (log CFU/g), and the mean was calculated for each analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%